<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: Creo - The CAD system formerly known as Pro/Engineer in Windchill</title>
    <link>https://community.ptc.com/t5/Windchill/Creo-The-CAD-system-formerly-known-as-Pro-Engineer/m-p/303179#M35650</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Agreed...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I liked your comparison of "Project Lightning" to licking 9V battery. About AnyRole App and AnyMode modeling. I understand PTC attempt to tie co-create and proe. In concept it seems like a good idea, but they have tried it before at least twice: pro/jr and pro/desktop. They were introduced as light end conceptual design tools from which you can "seamlessly" transition your design into proe. Did not work for designers and did not work for engineers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I liked the improvements in feature recognition and the ability to accept or reject the changes in the model. AnyBOM Assembly is impressive, but should see how it will work in real life.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My $.02&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dmi3U</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-29T15:55:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Creo - The CAD system formerly known as Pro/Engineer</title>
      <link>https://community.ptc.com/t5/Windchill/Creo-The-CAD-system-formerly-known-as-Pro-Engineer/m-p/303178#M35649</link>
      <description>Cross post of my blog: Creo - The CAD system formerly known asPro/Engineer&amp;lt;a 9 volt, but that's all. I guess if I appeared yesterday from 1985 in afrosty Delorean, I would say "Doc, you gotta take a look at this." &amp;lt;for is a data model written in RDF so that we can</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 17:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ptc.com/t5/Windchill/Creo-The-CAD-system-formerly-known-as-Pro-Engineer/m-p/303178#M35649</guid>
      <dc:creator>avillanueva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-02T17:05:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Creo - The CAD system formerly known as Pro/Engineer</title>
      <link>https://community.ptc.com/t5/Windchill/Creo-The-CAD-system-formerly-known-as-Pro-Engineer/m-p/303179#M35650</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Agreed...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I liked your comparison of "Project Lightning" to licking 9V battery. About AnyRole App and AnyMode modeling. I understand PTC attempt to tie co-create and proe. In concept it seems like a good idea, but they have tried it before at least twice: pro/jr and pro/desktop. They were introduced as light end conceptual design tools from which you can "seamlessly" transition your design into proe. Did not work for designers and did not work for engineers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I liked the improvements in feature recognition and the ability to accept or reject the changes in the model. AnyBOM Assembly is impressive, but should see how it will work in real life.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My $.02&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ptc.com/t5/Windchill/Creo-The-CAD-system-formerly-known-as-Pro-Engineer/m-p/303179#M35650</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dmi3U</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-29T15:55:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

