cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Have a PTC product question you need answered fast? Chances are someone has asked it before. Learn about the community search. X

y+, intelligent wall formulation, BL questions about Creo Flow

MW_10424792
4-Participant

y+, intelligent wall formulation, BL questions about Creo Flow

I'm starting to play around more with Creo Flow and am a little unclear about the available options for modeling the boundary layer

1) Is there an option to select a laminar boundary layer or is everything just modeled using a turbulent BL with k-eps formulation?

2) Are there other turbulent BL options other than k-eps?

3) does the k-eps BL option include an intelligent wall formulation, where the cells in the BL that have a y+ lower than some cutoff value are ignored?

4) What are some of the levers that I can pull to achieve y+ values in the typically desired range of 13-31?

Thanks!

MArk

 

 

ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
cfdgeek
13-Aquamarine
(To:MW_10424792)

Hi 

 

1) Is there an option to select a laminar boundary layer or is everything just modeled using a turbulent BL with k-eps formulation?

yes, in the physics module, just add flow without turbulence, then you don't have turbulence models in the project.

2) Are there other turbulent BL options other than k-eps?

yes, we have k-e and also RNG and realizable k-e, but k-e should fit be a good fit for most of cases. 

3) does the k-eps BL option include an intelligent wall formulation, where the cells in the BL that have a y+ lower than some cutoff value are ignored?

Yes. we already consider y+ range and turbulence BL structure in our wall functions. e.g. log low and sub layers

4) What are some of the levers that I can pull to achieve y+ values in the typically desired range of 13-31?

You can try reduce the surface mesh size and also consider reduce the aspect ratio of the mesh. all those meshing controls can be found in mesher properties. 

 

Hope this helps!

View solution in original post

6 REPLIES 6

Hi @MW_10424792,

Thank you for your question. 

Your post appears well documented but has not yet received any response. I am replying to raise awareness. Hopefully, another community member will be able to help.

Also, feel free to add any additional information you think might be relevant. It sometimes helps to have screenshots to better understand what you are trying to do.

 

Regards,

Anurag 

MW_10424792
4-Participant
(To:anursingh)

Many thanks for your help!

cfdgeek
13-Aquamarine
(To:MW_10424792)

Hi 

 

1) Is there an option to select a laminar boundary layer or is everything just modeled using a turbulent BL with k-eps formulation?

yes, in the physics module, just add flow without turbulence, then you don't have turbulence models in the project.

2) Are there other turbulent BL options other than k-eps?

yes, we have k-e and also RNG and realizable k-e, but k-e should fit be a good fit for most of cases. 

3) does the k-eps BL option include an intelligent wall formulation, where the cells in the BL that have a y+ lower than some cutoff value are ignored?

Yes. we already consider y+ range and turbulence BL structure in our wall functions. e.g. log low and sub layers

4) What are some of the levers that I can pull to achieve y+ values in the typically desired range of 13-31?

You can try reduce the surface mesh size and also consider reduce the aspect ratio of the mesh. all those meshing controls can be found in mesher properties. 

 

Hope this helps!

MW_10424792
4-Participant
(To:cfdgeek)

Thanks – that’s very helpful!

Mark L. Whittum, P.E.

Senior Principal Mechanical Engineer


O: +1 978.490.2240

C: +1 617.501.0341
mark.whittum@collins.com

Raytheon | An RTX Business

Global ISR Sensors & Software, EO&IR Solutions, Advanced Products and Solutions

7 Technology Park Drive

Westford, MA 01886

rtx/raytheon.com | LinkedIn | Twitter | Instagram | Facebook | YouTube

Hello @MW_10424792

 

It looks like you have a response from a community member. If it helped to answer your question please mark the reply as the Accepted Solution. 

Of course, if you have more to share on your issue, please let the Community know so other community members can continue to help you.

Thanks,
Vivek N.
Community Moderation Team.

Very helpful - thanks a bunch!

 

Mark

 

Announcements


Top Tags