cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

AW: AW: AW: Word to XML

kaestle
1-Newbie

AW: AW: AW: Word to XML

Hy Lynn,
the problem that Word 2003 can't open (as is tried) depends on the doctype
header.
you normally have something like this:


"\\RS\DocTypes\RS\RS.dtd">
<rs>
...
</rs>

if you take notepad or something similar an change to:


<rs>
...
</rs>

Word should be able to open it.

"Arbortext doesn't have to worry about Macro$carf taking their
business from them at this time."

I agree, and i think it's something like "stocks to watch for"

best regards

Roland

> Roland,
>
> Ich habe Word 2003 Pro.
>
> When I tried to open one of my XML files that Epic has no problem with
> using my DTD, it didn't like the file. As I said, as I was traveling, I
> haven't had time to really sit down and "play" (spiel) with it and see
> what
> it will or will not do. I just tried another file very quickly and I can
> get tag information, but if I try to associate it with anything (i.e. a
> DTD, the only thing that I can enter are schema (XSD) or other XML.
>
This will take some getting used to. Arbortext doesn't have to
worry about
Macro$carf taking their business from them at this time.

> Danke fur die Antwort.
>
> Lynn
>
>
1 REPLY 1
lynn
1-Newbie
(To:kaestle)

Roland,

Actually, the one file it didn't like only had a PUBLIC identifier with no
SYSTEM information. Or the DTD wasn't listed as in your example. I haven't
tried removing the DOCTYPE header (I'm an old SGML type and DOCTYPE headers
are needed).

Even with a file opened, Word 03 still didn't like my DTD. Like I said just
need time to experiment.

As for stocks to watch. Now that is scary. Arbortext, a division of
Macro$carf. Or worse. Macro$carf Epic. Enough to scare me.

Lynn
Announcements