cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Need help navigating or using the PTC Community? Contact the community team. X

Regarding SPR2831087

0 Kudos

Regarding SPR2831087

Status: Archived Submitted by 1-Newbie on ‎Jan 23, 2017 12:31 AM
5 Comments (5 New)

We would like to know why SPR 2831087 has not been addressed by PTC till date  same problem has been faced by us &one of our componment got rejected( cost of component is around 10lakh). due to his  we had failed in meeting customer delevery shedule  hence PTC has to take it on priority resolve the issue. refer attachment for details.

case has been raised 13506256

See more ideas labeled with:
5 Comments
Chris3
20-Turquoise
20-Turquoise
‎Jan 23, 2017 07:27 AM
‎Jan 23, 2017 07:27 AM

Link to SPR:

https://support.ptc.com/appserver/cs/view/spr.jsp?n=2831087‌

Title of SPR: How to restrict Pro/ENGINEER not to use existing detailed view name for another detail view in drawing

SRIKANTH CHANDRASHEKAR‌ you might want to vote on your own idea.

StephenW
23-Emerald II
23-Emerald II
‎Jan 23, 2017 07:41 AM
‎Jan 23, 2017 07:41 AM

There is a discussion Re: Creo Parametric 2.0 M130,is allowed to create detail views with same name in the drawing. This h...

According to PTC, they have a valid use case for this functionality, but details were not disclosed.

mender
6-Contributor
6-Contributor
‎Feb 24, 2017 02:16 PM
‎Feb 24, 2017 02:16 PM

This is (being) implemented, see copied from the discussion noted below.  I'll ask someone to mark this idea appropriately.

--

For reference, the use cases we have been given by customers include using a drawing program to show one or another flavor of 'Detail A', and also having a multi-sheet drawing with one sheet for each instance of a family table of parts, each of which can have its own Detail A.  (Maybe others?  It was a numbe rof years ago...)  Whether or not this is reasonable is a question for debate.  However, PM has agreed that it should be considered non-standard, and so I have been authorized to improve matters, as follows:

In Creo 2 M250, Creo 3 M130, and Creo 4 M010, there will be a new config option 'allow_duplicate_view_names yes/NO'.  When set to yes, no change from previous builds.  When set to no, we will reject attempts to rename a view to duplicate another, and also will check on retrieval and regen draft for current duplication and give a warning.  All messages will note the sheet number of the duplicate view and mention the config option by name.

Thank you for raising this issue, and enjoy the new functionality!

StephenW
23-Emerald II
23-Emerald II
‎Feb 24, 2017 02:25 PM
‎Feb 24, 2017 02:25 PM

Thanks Matthew Ender. I think you have gotten it right. Having the option makes sense and having it default to "expected" process is best.

olivierlp
Community Manager
Community Manager
‎Jan 04, 2022 10:10 AM
‎Jan 04, 2022 10:10 AM
Status changed to: Archived

Hello,

We are archiving your idea as part of a general review. This action is based on the age of your idea and the total number of votes received, as per this announcement.

You can always post a new idea with all the details required in the form.

Thank you for your participation.