in optic of MBD, it was useful to have the capabilities to create some table in 3D with Repeat Region (with the same capabilities of the 2D)
I would love this for cabling, which is heavily dependent on tables.
This Functionality is very important to have the ability to use MBD in assembly-lines/assembly-stations without drawings. Currently the drawing is still necessary because of the BOM-Table and BOM-Balloons. Therefore this request is also affecting Creo View, which should also support this functionality by using the pvs/pvz-export.
Maybe a splitted view with the Model on one side and the BOM-Table on the other side can rout to a useful solution.
BTW: we use Component-parameters with our BOM-Tool (Toolkit) to save the position-numbers or other parameters permanently to the model. The Component-parameters can be used by notes with the syntax &POSITION:att_cmp, but unfortunately not for custom-symbols.
Why has this not been implemented yet ? CREO7 and still no ability to create Tables in model annotations. extremely disappointed
Complementary operations are also needed: exclude from BOM, Phantom and envelopevcomponents, since not all items in the assembly are included in the production process.
would be awesome to auto generate find numbers as a 3d annotation set in addition to a BOM repeat region without having to create a 2d drawing
PTC Please do this, I have been struggling with Manufacturing Engineers complaining to me as I'm the only MBD certified engineer at my facility. I am currently thinking of ways to create a custom symbol, maybe by creating a custom parameter that is pulled from Windchill, but if PTC would just create repeat regions in MBD and add the table tab it would be soooooo much easier and much appreciated.
#2. We working on MBD and are facing a lot of challenges in pulling out Revision history and BOM.
Pulling up table in to Part mode is a challenge. (Revision Table, Color Part Table )
"So we need 3d annotation to include table functionality (with symbol type)" - what do you mean when you say "with symbol type"
So regarding the balloons request. do you really feel that is really required for MBD?
What you say I agree, Real time examples
Example :- But when we export it to a PDF and exploring the details on the downstream (Shop floor) for the person working on machine will be difficult
Vendor/Supplier- need to figure out the part in the TDP which is share with him and discuss with Engineer and GSS person
- If we do a exploded view to highlight all the parts in the assembly is much needed.
Right now I am creating table using Notes not sure if its a right process and weather it will sustain.
Need to align the columns a lot
Notes added :- @[and @]
@[REVISION@]@[Approved_By @]@[ DESCRPTION @]@[ Date (day-mo-yr) @]@[D @]@[LANDGSJ @]@[Combination for the chang @]@[ Date (08-12-2021 @]
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.