The selection filter is a very helpful tool. It would be more helpful and easy to use if the list was in alphabetical order.
Here is the current WF5 order of the list in part mode.
This particular time the list is short, so easier to look through. Sometimes it gets longer and hard to find what you are looking for.
This might be hard to do, but it would be nice if there were an option to set the default zoom on new parts. When you are working on small metric parts it is hard to make the first sketch the right size. It seems to always end up too large. This causes you to have to scale the part and hope eveything moves correctly and you don't have any accidental constrants.
Many of our engineers work on handheld devices, so the internal parts are less than an inch. With the default sketcher zoom it seems that you always end up with 5 or 10 inch parts (or as in the picture below 76.44mm parts in metric, instead of 15mm).
Maybe there could be a config option to set the default zoom. Then it could be set to a value that is close to what most of your work needs.
When we merge two surfaces, Pro/E is about 95% successful at choosing the wrong (default) side to keep, for both surfaces!
I've just merged a series of surfaces into my main quilt, the sequence being:
Select main quilt (graphics area)
Select new quilt (graphics area)
Select Merge (top right)
Change side of both quilts (bottom left)
Select new quilt (graphics area)
Select Merge (top right)
Change side of both quilts (bottom left)
Graphics area
Top right
Bottom left
Graphics area
Top right
Bottom left...
Does everyone else find that it wants to keep the wrong part of the quilt, or are we just using it wrong? 
If other users agree, it should be easy to add a "NOT" to the code for this function.
Creating section views in Pro/E is extremely powerful. If would be even better if you could also create dynamic sections to complement the fixed sections. For this I think it would be great to bring in the dymanic section technology from ProductView.
This would allow the engineer the ability to look through the model and check for interferences. With the technology in ProductView it is also great, then non-CAD users can check the systems.
Here is a screenshot of ProductView:
Forgot to put in that it would be nice if the cross-section interface was easier to use and much quicker.
Folks,
Most of what we have been kicking around so far has to do with the User Interface, very important for clarity, efficiency, etc. Interestingly, this probably says--without saying--that the underlying substantive modeling capabilities are not where there is a deficiency. However, there is also room for improvement in geometry creation. The biggest thing I've wished for since I started (on 12.0) is a Swept Revolve. In other words: Give me what an endmill does!!! (More generally, what a rotating cutter does; and while you're at it, it might as well be capable of adding material in the same manner.)
All of this geometry can be constructed using various Pro/E feature types and techniques, but how much easier some of them would be if you could just lay down a trajectory (and a half section only if necessary) and be done with it! Examples above include simple slots on the flat, inclined cuts, & cam slots on a cylinder produced with a standard end mill as well as a dovetail slot and a slot created with a form cutter. All of this geometric reality is already present in Pro/Manufacturing, NC-Check, and Vericut; it just needs to be enabled for modeling.
Those cam grooves on the cylinder (from a "real" project) are part of a pattern; having to add the end geometry in that case, then Reference Pattern, was particularly time-consuming, and sometimes on the edge of successful regeneration, depending on dimensions, etc.
David
A little follow-up, Re: Swept Blend request:
Just to be fair (to the capable geometry gurus at PTC) the request is not as easy to fulfill as it may seem. In general, the standard geometric techniques for sweeps and blends are much easier to execute because the sections do not extend out-of-plane. Just look at the simple example below. This shows 3 ways one might try to create a barrel cam slot (1" diameter barrel, 3/8" diameter cutter, 1/4" deep, pitch 2). Left to right: (1) Thru Axis rectangular section with cylinder dropped into the end, (2) Normal to Trajectory rectangular section with cylinder dropped into the end, and (3) Closely spaced pattern of cylinder drops to illustrate what actually happens. Take particular note of the thru-axis section boundaries. It may seem obvious that Thru Axis would be immediately rejected. However, because of the complexity of the situation, Thru Axis actually generates some of the real geometry that Normal to Trajectory does not, namely the flat bottom of the slot. Normal to Trajectory doesn't give us everything either because the cylindrical shape of the end mill "breaks out of" the twisted ribbon envelope of the simple sweep, giving a flared shape to the actual section. (The flare is made obvious in a normal-to-trajectory section.) Much more can be said about the details, but a picture will do here.
Bottom line: not easy, but all the more reason for nice to have.
....But they were, all of them, deceived, for another Interface was made. In the land of PTC, in the fires of Mount doom, the Dark Lord Sauron forged in secret a Master Interface, to control all others. And into this Interface he poured his cruelty, his malice, and his will to dominate all users. 
