cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Doors to Integrity using RIF

SOLVED
Highlighted
Newbie

Doors to Integrity using RIF

If there is a requirement 1.1.1 which has some comment inside a field, can we create an additional requirement 1.1.1.1 to that in the xml mapping file?

Something like the attachment... Here 3.13.1 is a requirement with some value, now can I create additional requirement to that 3.13.1.1. Is this possible? How can this be achieved?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Re: Doors to Integrity using RIF

Hello Karthik,

I don't have the background with RIF to be able to address your question, and it seems I'm not alone. Have you opened a case with PTC Integrity Support?

Regards,

Kael


Kind Regards,
Kael Lizak

Senior Technical Support Engineer
PTC Integrity Lifecycle Manager
2 REPLIES 2

Re: Doors to Integrity using RIF

Hello Karthik,

I don't have the background with RIF to be able to address your question, and it seems I'm not alone. Have you opened a case with PTC Integrity Support?

Regards,

Kael


Kind Regards,
Kael Lizak

Senior Technical Support Engineer
PTC Integrity Lifecycle Manager

Re: Doors to Integrity using RIF

Hi Kael,

I actually came up with a workaround for the above issue. Instead of doing this on the xml mapping file, I opted for a trigger in Integrity to create a new requirement when conditions are met. This way i would customisation/configuration changes that would be needed only on the Integrity side.

I have not created a ticket for this, but if required in future I will get back to PTC Integrity support.

Thanks for getting back to me.

Kind Regards,

Karthik