cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Have a PTC product question you need answered fast? Chances are someone has asked it before. Learn about the community search. X

Creo 3.0 profile issues

BillChapman
12-Amethyst

Creo 3.0 profile issues

We recently updated from Creo 2.0 to Creo 3.0 M020. We are seeing odd behavior using profile milling, specifically when multiple discrete surfaces are selected in the same profile sequence. The motions between surfaces (regions) are not output as rapids. This was fine in Creo 1 and 2. Any known changes to this? Any work around?


This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

SPR 2253685 has been filed for this. The work around for the failed sequence is to set GOUGE_AVOID_TYPE TIP_ONLY. There is no reason setting this to TIP_&_SIDES should cause a failure (it works fine with this setting in Creo 2.0) but it causes the sequence to fail in 3.0.

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2

Also seeing sequence failures with profile that we have never seen. Selecting 4 simple (but non adjacent) surfaces causes the sequence to fail. See attached image. The 4 corner chamfers are selected as individual surfaces and the sequence does not work. Something has changed or there is a serious bug.

CORNERS.png

SPR 2253685 has been filed for this. The work around for the failed sequence is to set GOUGE_AVOID_TYPE TIP_ONLY. There is no reason setting this to TIP_&_SIDES should cause a failure (it works fine with this setting in Creo 2.0) but it causes the sequence to fail in 3.0.

Top Tags