cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Version conflicts 2001 to wildfire

cncwhiz
1-Newbie

Version conflicts 2001 to wildfire

I know that we are behind a lot of people out there but we are running wf2.0. We use "intralink" and "pro manufacturing" as well a modeling, drawings and assemblies. We have an old dog who keeps trying to use 2001 for R&D. He gives me the models he made to build programs in pro manufacturing. I am using wildfire. This is not a real big issue for the first time around but when I do a revision by replacing the model I end up with all kinds of issues. We also have problems with opening up old parts in intralink that were built in 2001. The R&D guy says that he thinks that 2001 is not causing me problems, I say it need to go away. The engineering manager has told him to run the same version we are all running. Does or did anyone have issues between these versions?
This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.
3 REPLIES 3

Hi Everyone,



I know this is not a specific Pro-E question, but I would like to know what
is the most cost effective method to produce a logo / trademark in a
Polypropylene part? The current part design is embossed with a logo from the
mold tooling. However, as the color of the logo matches with surface color,
it does not stand out prominently.



Some options I have considered are Pad Printing, molded-in labeling, etc.
Does anyone have a suggestion for a lower cost / good value option? Also, I
noticed the current design of this part has a zero degree draft (I would
think it would case excessive wear on the mold tooling). I have seen a
document claiming PP requires at least one degree draft per side. Does
anyone have any experience or design information that would support
designing a PP part with ½ degree draft angle or less per side?



On a completely unrelated topic, I am in southern California this week
working with a small company. I would be interested in having information on
local (San Diego or vicinity) machine-shops with in-house CNC capability, as
I usually do not work in this area of the country.



Chris

Now that someone thread jumped me, I would like to get back to the posted topic. I have not recieved too many postings on this topic. Is this beacuse you have not had this happen or are you the old dog?
dgschaefer
21-Topaz II
(To:cncwhiz)



In Reply to:
Now that someone thread jumped me, I would like to get back to the posted topic. I have not recieved too many postings on this topic. Is this beacuse you have not had this happen or are you the old dog?
Classic example of re-using 'reply to all' in an old email to reply to the list. Chris probably has no idea this happened, he simply used 'reply toall' on your post to start a new topic, changing the subject and everything. The forum software still recognized it as belonging here, however. Most folks don't browse the actual forum, they interact with it via email.

Folks please don't use 'reply to all' to start a new thread. It doesn't, it gets appended to the original on the web site. Follow the link atthe bottom to the thread to see what Imean.

BTW - On the topic, I sent youa private reply, did you receive it?

Doug Schaefer
--
Doug Schaefer | Experienced Mechanical Design Engineer
LinkedIn
Announcements
Attention: Creo 7.0 Customers
Please consider upgrading
End of Life announcement here.

NEW Creo+ Topics:
PTC Control Center
Creo+ Portal
Real-time Collaboration