cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Your Friends List is a way to easily have access to the community members that you interact with the most! X

Bug? Error in simple sum...

sd_gaertner
1-Visitor

Bug? Error in simple sum...

Hello,

I just stumbled upon the weird fact that for Prime1 certain sums are not absolutely correct. For example, Prime1 calculates

1.4 + 0.2 = 1.6

So far, so good.

But if I check if (1.4+0.2) is the same as 1.6, Prime1 tells me it is NOT!

When I create the difference it gives out

1.4 + 0.2 - 1.6 = 2.22*10^-16

which is almost correct but just not correct enough!

In the case of

1.2 + 0.4 = 1.6

Prime1 works correctly.

Please see the attached Prime1-sheet for further examples.

Is this a common error with any calculation software or is this just mathcad?

Is there a way to avoid this error?

Best regards

Sebastian

15 REPLIES 15

I think it is "a bug". We have same "bug" in Mathcad 15 when we have not 3-16 digits in rezult 1.4+.2-1.6= but 17 digits (maximum).

BUT why "a bug" not a bug!

The first rule by working with floating point (in Fortran, for example) - do not use the "exact equal" operator and use only the "approximately equal" (see the picture). We can use an "exact equal" operator only by working with strings, boolean, intrgers etc variables.
We must always remember it too by working with "smart" Mathcad .

AEqu.png

Hello!

Here what result turns out in Mathcad 15 M010 (so, there is no problem with that):

MC15.jpg

And in Mathcad Prime 1.0 (It is possible to see what numerical value is accepted for "0"):

Prime 1.0.jpg

Mathcad 15

17.PNG

Above shows the result in Mathcad 15 with default settings (number of decimals: 3).

VladimirN. wrote:

Above shows the result in Mathcad 15 with default settings (number of decimals: 3).

One tour guide at the museum told the visitors that the exhibit has an age of two million and seven years.
All were surprised accuracy of the calculation.
The guide replied that when he went to work at the museum, the main tour guide told him that the exhibit has two million years of age. And since he spent seven years ...

Valery,

"Setting decimal digits to 17 means display all bits in the internal representation. Double floating point precision only supports 15 significant digits, so displaying more than that will show some artifact of the internal representation.

The "17" digit precision is intended for two purposes:

1) when copying the value (as string) it will copy _all_ information internally stored and not round the number.

2) for debugging edge-case situations where round-off bits cause unexpected results (e.g. when rounding or truncating values)."

P.S. This response I received from the technical support PTC, as long ago created a query in the PTC.

Have you formatted the results?

Increased the exponential threshold?

Mike

The difference between Mathcad 15 and earlier versions and Mathcad Prime 1.0, is that Mathcad Prime displays small numbers unlike Mathcad 15.0 which displays small numbers as 0. It's an issue of floating point precision on computers. I am raising this issue with the developers since it came up in another context.

However, if this is evaluated symbolically, it shows the expected result.

zero.png

Mona

mzeftel
12-Amethyst
(To:mzeftel)

Mathcad Prime 1.0 has double point floating point precision. It's not possible to represent some numbers, due to rounding errors.

If you look at the Formatting tab, you will see that we chose General as the default Result Format, so that small numbers would be displayed, such as Plank's constant:

plancks.png

If you want your small zero's to display as zero, then switch to Decimal in the Result Format, as you see above.

We are discussing ways to increase Mathcad's precision in the future, but that will have an effect on performance.

Mona

Mona,

it will be better if Mathcad Prime returns a more correct units of constants:

CPlank.png

VladimirN
24-Ruby II
(To:mzeftel)

I think that here the user can leave a choice (in Mathcad Prime), but rather possibility to control productivity of the computer changing precision of calculations.

Cheers for the explanation Mona,

Mike

VladimirN
24-Ruby II
(To:mzeftel)

Yes, it is evaluated using the symbolic math in Mathcad Prime 2.0 (as shown in the screenshot). There we have the value "0".

See please the picture:

bug1-2.png

You can change a & b values in attached Mathcad-sheet and see new answer of the a-b operator

PS We have yet discussed this "bug".

I know this is an ancient thread, but it's the first one I found about this.

Anyway, there is an option to calculate approximate equalities by default:

http://support.ptc.com/help/mathcad/en/index.html#page/PTC_Mathcad_Help/to_set_calculation_options.html

 

Announcements

Top Tags