cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Did you get an answer that solved your problem? Please mark it as an Accepted Solution so others with the same problem can find the answer easily. X

odesolve: you must evaluate this operator symblically

Cornel
18-Opal

odesolve: you must evaluate this operator symblically

Hi,

Cornel_0-1716973091957.png

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
LucMeekes
23-Emerald III
(To:Cornel)

The Lambert W function is not defined numerically in Prime. There exist (numerical) approximation functions for it, but I doubt if they will bring you closer to a solution for your DE.

 

 

Success!

Luc

 

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
LucMeekes
23-Emerald III
(To:Cornel)

Correct. That is because your DE contains the Lambert W function.

I doubt that you will find a symbolic solution to your DE though.

 

Success!

Luc


@LucMeekes wrote:

I doubt that you will find a symbolic solution to your DE though.


I do not want to find a symbolic solution, but instead a numeric one

LucMeekes
23-Emerald III
(To:Cornel)

The Lambert W function is not defined numerically in Prime. There exist (numerical) approximation functions for it, but I doubt if they will bring you closer to a solution for your DE.

 

 

Success!

Luc

 

Top Tags