As you do not show what you are actually trying we have to stab in the dark 😞
The error message you mention is thrown when you don't provide a function argument (by default you would see a question mark instead of the three dots)
But as this is very obvious I guess that's not the problem which you experience.
So for sure you would need to show examples of what you are doing and it also may help if you state which kind of Mathcad you are using (real, legacy Mathcad 15 or below or Prime) and which version.
Can you post the failing worksheet or at least a screenshot!?
Have you tried what I show in the second line (pi/6) with the same error?
Have you tried too use the unit "deg" instead of "°" as seen in Terrys answer. You may explicitly type a multiplication after the number as Terry did, but it should not be necessary, just type "deg" after the number. That way you won't see a dot between the two
Are the letters "sin" upright or italic? When you click somewhere in "sin" and then look at menu Math-Style-Label, do you see "Function" as in the screenshot below or something else? If something else, does it help when you manually change the label to "Function"? Changing it to "Automatic" should work as well.
Actually I don't think that wrong labelling is the cause as the error message would be something else ("variable undefined") if that would be the case, but without seeing what you actually typed and without being able to play around with your worksheet we still are just stabbing in the dark 😞
You sure have typed the normal equal sign and not the fat boolean one which you get with Ctrl-+ !? Guess that could not be the cause, either, as if you use the boolean equal you won't get any error message - Prime would just wait for you to type in the RHS of the equation and tell it what you want to be done with the equation.
When you are using the inverse sinus (arcsin, in Prime called asin) and want to see the result in degree rather than the default radian, you unfortunately can't simply type "°" as we can do in real Mathcad. In Prime we get the exact error message you experience. You either have to type "deg" in the unit placeholder or uncomfortably chose the unit degree from the units menu.
But then you sure did not want the result of the sine function to be displayed in degree as the result isn't an angle anyway.
So again just a lot of shots in the dark...
Do you experience any problems with the attached worksheet?
It sure will look OK when you just open it as all you see is the last view I had over here. You should let the sheet recalculate (F9 or F5) to see what your installation of Prime thinks of it.
I am using Prime 6 but I don't think that such a severe bug could have found its way in P8 an remained undetected until now.
Here is what you should see, also after recalculation:
And one last try: You didn't do this (putting the angle outside of the parentheses), didn't you?
Here is what I am getting. As you can see, I tried your suggestion regarding the sin(30 deg) without the multiplier dot included and got the one on the top left.
Hi,
There are three equals signs in Prime each one is different
:= assignment equals
= output equals
= equivalence
It really would have helped if you had attached your worksheet as well!
@DU_8998062 wrote:
Well okay then. I only know of the one equal sign, :=. How do you incorporate the other types of equal signs? What keys?
Actually there are two more "equal signs" additionally to the three mentioned by Terry - the symbolic evaluation and the global definition.
But you seem to know already at least of two different equal signs as we see that you had used them in your picture (and they sure are the most important two equal signs you should know of).
Obviously you used the "normal" equal sign (numeric evaluation) when you got the correct result for sin (30 deg).
And you used the assignment/definition equal (which you get by simply typing a colon ":") when you assigned the value 45 deg to phi and theta.
In all expressions which failed I see an assignment := instead of an evaluation =.
Did you type this? if so, than thats the culprit.
You have to type just a normal equal sign to numerically evaluate an expression.
Example:
The first region is an assignment/definiton (note the colon ":") - the variable phi is assigned the value pi/6; the variable is defined. And the last two regions are numeric evaluations (note that there is NO colon here!)
See also
https://support.ptc.com/help/mathcad/r8.0/en/index.html#page/PTC_Mathcad_Help/evaluation_operator.html
or
or
BTW, as you already had success with sin(30 deg). It should work as well if you type an explicit multiplication and it should also work using the degree sign. It really looks to me that you always used the assignment definition := instead of the evaluation =
You also have not answered my question if you experienced any problems with the file I had attached when you let prime recalculate it!
@cadtelsim wrote:
Hello,
I'm having the same problem, I read through the discussion here, make sure I'm using the correct operator, and started a whole new worksheet to make sure there are no interference, but still get a wrong calculation output involving trig:
The first part of the problem is straightforward: you still need to define the variable t that appears in the exponent.
I don't know what values you are expecting, but if the 49.98 and 62.053 are angles specified in degrees, then the degree symbol needs to be attached to each angle. The way it is written in your worksheet, the unit is applied to the value of sine(12.073 radians).
If you're trying to find Idc at several values of t, then it's better to define Idc as a function of t.
.
Stuart
Thank you for your solution, but I'm looking for the value of Idc at the exact time the source voltage is 300 volts. That value is a simple calculation as follows:
should equal 95.942 as calculator returns, but I can not get that value in ptc, could you help me with that? Its highlighted in the worksheet.
Didn't you read what Stuart wrote about the placing of the degree symbols?
And the result is the tenfold of the value you name
You could also make it that way
but I sure would not suggest doing so.
BTW, for future questions it may be better to open a new thread for your question
I did read Stuarts note, The calculation now in the new worksheet shows the correct amount. In the original worksheet still shows wrong,
But I can clean up my calculations and hopefully that will take care of it.
The problem is that you redefined the sinus function:
When you use sin(...) after this definition, Prime assumes that you want to use you newly defined function (which returns a constant value independent of the argument alpha) and not the built-in sin-function.
You can tell which function is used by looking for the used font - the built-in uses a straight font while your sin-function is displayed in italic.
You could change this manually by labelling the "sin" as "Function" and not as "Variable". But its sure better not to use "sin" as a function name for a user defined function.
