cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Did you get an answer that solved your problem? Please mark it as an Accepted Solution so others with the same problem can find the answer easily. X

defining a variable

jreddy
1-Newbie

defining a variable

hello im solving the equation at the end .But i dont want that unknown variable to be marked in red colour how to solve this problem.

36 REPLIES 36

Capture.PNG

here T_2_10k is taking the value of 1ft*lbf...how could mike solve with out getting this error

Werner_E
24-Ruby V
(To:jreddy)

Can't debug a picture.

Also I already had written twice in this thread what to do to make the symbolics happy (=make the solved for variable unknown to the symbolics).

see this file

Werner_E
24-Ruby V
(To:jreddy)

jagadeesh reddy wrote:

see this file

Yes, I experience the same problem. Curiosly enough it works if you define T_2_10k to 1 Joule instead.

But I wouldn't recommend that mixed symbolic/numeric approach anyway.

Can you mention the clear process for symbolics it into symbolics for me

Thank you

Werner_E
24-Ruby V
(To:jreddy)

jagadeesh reddy wrote:

Can you mention the clear process for symbolics it into symbolics for me

Thank you

Already done here

http://communities.ptc.com/message/265124#265124

and here

http://communities.ptc.com/message/265234#265234

So one last time: Immedeatly after defining T_2_10k you follow the definiton with T_2_10k:=T_2_10k.

1.png

This should work.

Thank you this worked

Top Tags