I'm just wondering if the following has been noticed before, and if it has been dealt with after WF3.
I tried to build a symmetric pattern where the original feature is in the middle and relations are used to locate the remainder. The relation is -offset + X x IDX.
What is interesting is that IDX1 is not treated the same as all the others. It keeps the original dimensions and ignores the relation. This results in a misplaced first feature.
Another problem I ran into was that IF statements did not work right.
For example:
IF (IDX1 == 3)
memb_v = 10
ENDIF
would have an error that neither memb_v or memb_i was used, but
IF (IDX1 != 3)
memb_v = 10
ENDIF
was accepted.
The statement:
IF (IDX1 != 2) & (IDX2!=2) was treated as if the '&' was an OR statement. I also tried nested IF statements and got the OR statement answer.
It would also be nice if the documentation mentioned if IDX1 and IDX2 were 0 based or 1 based.
Dave S.
WF 3
This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.
