cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Tips for text

Re: Tips for text

Oh... and I meant to add the next best thing I can suggest is a custom symbol. That should get you around the problem.

Thanks!

-Brian

Re: Tips for text

Egad... even the custom symbol idea is a harrowing nightmare. I was able to create a gorgeous symbol that does everything you want except for one very silly limitation. You cannot use a construction circle as the basis for a radial attachment point in a symbol. You also cannot use an arc (portion of a circle). It MUST be a full, solid circle... not a partial... not a construction.

WHY?! Geez do we really care if the symbol attachment point is based on the center of a construction circle (which does not show up on the field of the drawing)? Okay then so maybe I'll just use a teeny, tiny arc... solid... but so small it's not detectable. Nope. Doesn't work. What about a really big arc... 359 degrees? Nope. Doesn't work either.

I've just joined the Detailing Technical Committee (took about a month to get on it). I can promise I will bring these issues up and see if I can get them resolved. These have to be very easy fixes.

Thanks... and sorry this is such a pain!

Re: Tips for text

How do you get onto this committee?

When I last used Pro/E for extensive detailing, we were still using the old style datum tags ( [-A-] ). These were easy to fake in.

In the drawing that caused the system to crash, I needed to tie the datum tag to a horizontal line representing a contiguous surface that the datum tag represents. It simply couldn't be done since the line was a drafting sketch feature.

I have a second problem with model generated datum tags in drawings. The axial datum comes out bold (line thickness) while the tagged plane datum came out thin. This is really a very lousy implementation. Why am I the 1st to comment on this?

Re: Tips for text

You can sign up for the Technical Committees (abbreviated as just the "TC's") by going to ptcuser.org and clicking on PTC/User Technical Committees in the center of the homepage under "Get Involved". Here's a direct link to the Technical Committee homepage (Direct Link)

Once you're on the homepage, click "Find a TC" from the left hand pane. If you're not yet a member of PTC/User, you'll have to sign up before you can go any further. Once you're signed up (totally free), you can see the various committees and select which one(s) you'd like to join.

Participation in the TCs requires a bit of a commitment. Users are expected to participate in meetings and contribute to the group. Two face-to-face meetings occur each year- one in January at PTC Headquarters and a second one at the Planet PTC Live Event. Next years' Planet PTC Live event will be held in Anaheim (June 9-12). During these meetings, the entire committee has the opportunity to sit down with PTC developers and Product Line Managers. We discuss the software, enhancement requests, bugs, and ask questions to get answers "directly from the horse's mouth" so to speak.

It took me quite a bit of effort to get onto the Detail TC (the committee concerned with drawing & detailing issues). Now that I'm on it, I'm anxious to start logging my feedback. I'm tempering this enthusiasm though because historically I know PTC hasn't put much into the drawing package. I also know this is intentional. As a long time user, I have felt (and continue to feel) that this is a critical mistake. If I had the ear of the developers, CEO, CFO, or anyone else who would listen, I'd try to steer them from this path. PTC has always believe that model-based engineering is the way forward and that paper is antique and archaic. While I agree, I can tell you from experience that most industries and most companies are not ready for this yet. It's just starting to get traction and adoption will continue to be painfully slow. In the meantime, people WANT and need drawing tools that work. In my opinion, PTC makes a tremendous blunder by allowing their competitors to service this space while they ignore it waiting for a day when their vision meets with reality.

So... I joined the Detailing TC and I plan to do my best to push for enhancements. If not earth-splitting enhancements that create the drawing package we want, then at the very least fixing the bugs, closing the loopholes, and making the drawing package we already have work to it's optimum.

Re: Tips for text

Sweet, Brian. I can think of no better voice in the committee than yours. If it wasn't for the commitment for the face-time, I would be happy to participate. I simply don't have funds to go flying all over the country on my dime.

If what you say is true, and if it continues, I will save my maintenance pennies and invest my $ and hours in SolidWorks or possibly Elements Direct. At this point, I simply cannot make certified documents with the incomplete detailing tools in Creo/Pro. This is certainly not acceptable on my end as this is how I make my living. I will continue to submit support requests to achieve the minimal requirements to do my job.

Is it part of the committee's function to review SPR's submitted by users in relation to limitations and problems with making proper drawings?

I also submitted the recreation of the crash with datum tags in drawings. very sad!

Can I send PTC a bill for my lost hours to do what their QC failed to do?

Sorry Kevin, for hijacking your wonderful post. I was hoping for answers, not more problems.

Re: Tips for text

The TC's don't normally review SPRs as far as I know. But we do review enhancements and ideas submitted from committee members. I'd love to see the ideas from Planet PTC Community find their way to the TC's for voting, too. I've mentioned this to several people but I don't think we know what will "officially" become of the ideas from this site yet.

There was a time I didn't hold out much hope to see meaningful improvements in the software owing to a sort of "tone deafness" from PTC. And, it's certainly fair to say maybe I am the only one who perceived that tone deafness. However, in the last couple of years I've seen real improvements in the way PTC has addressed some long-standing problems. For awhile I was cautiously optimistic. The first signs of progress were almost like seeing a mirage. I wasn't sure if I was really seeing what I thought I was seeing. But over the past 1-2 years I have to say, there's definitely something positive going on. Now, there are still problems... but it feels like PTC is really starting to listen. It feels like they're really starting to try to hear voices from the user community. This is real progress. They may have gone through the motions of listening and responding to criticism before... but now it feels like their heart is in it.

I think that makes all the difference in the world. So now, I do have hope that we can improve the drawing package. I'll do whatever I can to pursue that goal. I'd encourage anyone else who'd like to join to visit ptcuser.org and learn more about the TC's.

Take care...

Re: Tips for text

Yes, I'd seen this before in days long past but it was only a fizzle in the pan.

Back on subject;

YOU TOO CAN CREATE YOUR OWN FONT! ( maybe I should define a "DATUM" symbol font set )

Technically, the .fnt fonts, as compared to true type fonts, are simple micro-plotter files.

They have a small definable grid in which you can define "move to" and "draw" commands between grid points.

There are source files, index files, and compiled files. Don't trust the source files, however since I have already decompiled a few fonts where the source and the decompiled versions did not match. Another QC glitch!

All the tools are there and the getting started manual has pretty much everything you need.

I do have one SPR into tech support. The manual clearly states that the max text box height is 63, and there are fonts with heights up to 76. Which one is in error? That SPR has been submitted over a month ago and they assure me that they are still working on it.

Re: Tips for text

I found this that might help this category:

Use a $ in relations to use negative values -

Relations


All relations valid in a Creo Parametric model can be entered in a Pro/PROGRAM design.

If an expression you want to include in the RELATIONS statement contains more than 80 characters, use a backslash (\) to interrupt the current line and continue the expression on the next line.

The format can be as follows:

RELATIONS PARAMETER = COVER_SIZE/2 + LENGTH*0.75 -\ 
0.75*d3*d3 + THICKNESS*2 END RELATIONS

Changing the material density in a part causes the system to update the mp_density value in relations and vice versa.

Note

  • When using negative dimensions, a dollar sign ($) must precede the dimension symbol in both the input statement and the external input files. For example, use $d20 instead of d20. The dimensions will not be updated if a dollar sign does not precede the symbols.
  • If the program assigns a value to a dimension variable that is already driven by a part or subassembly relation, two error messages appear. Edit or remove the program relation and regenerate.
Highlighted

Re: Tips for text

Also found this:

If you have a string of variables like in hole callouts, you noticed that you require spaces between the end of the variable and new text characters. This is why you see...

&THREAD_SERIES - &THREAD_CLASS

UNF - 2B
...a text string which is obviously not to any standard that we as engineers accept.

But there is a little known method to remove the requirement for the space:

{0:&THREAD_SERIES}-{1:&THREAD_CLASS} ...which returns

UNF-2B

Old school editor but this is what makes it work.

Why didn't PTC do this for the hole CALLOUT_FORMAT?

PTC, are you listening? This is what "we" call fit and finish

Re: Tips for text

The extraneous spaces have always been an issue. I've been removing them for years... or else just skipping the automatic cosmetic thread notes altogether.