WF5 without the use of Windchill or Intralink?

[agaribay]

We're not looking to upgrade to Windchill and so our current setup
(Intralink 3.4) would allow us to run WF4.



Just wondering if any of you are working with WF5 without the use of
Windchill or Intralink?



Not sure what we're going to do, I'm just curious.





Thanks, and Happy Friday!



-Art






.

.

.

.

This message (including any attachments) contains

confidential and/or proprietary information intended

only for the addressee. Any unauthorized disclosure,

copying, distribution or reliance on the contents of this

information is strictly prohibited and may constitute a violation

of law. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the

sender immediately by responding to this e-mail, and delete the

message from your system. If you have any questions about this

e-mail please notify the sender immediately.

This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.

[ptc-1932745]

We are now using WF5, we have been using Pro-E since about version 3 (I
think), and have never used PDM, either Intralink or Windchill. We have
up to 10 designers / engineers working in small groups on projects and
float between projects as needed.



To do 'what-if' scenarios, we do a pseudo - commonspace / workspace by
backing up assemblies / drawings locally and working out of working
directories.



After changes are approved, we manually move all of the models /
assemblies / drawings back into the public folders.

( a PITA, but not as much as trying to implement and administer PDM... )





Christopher F. Gosnell



FPD Company

124 Hidden Valley Road

McMurray, PA 15317