your welcome,
Some more comments.
I tried this beam in 5M length, simply supported.
The beam as a member appears strong enough for 60kN with about a 7 times safety factor, with one caveat, the local stress where the load is applied. The load cannot be a point load, it needs to be spread out evenly over a large enough area to reduce local stress enough to make the system efficient. That is why overhead cranes have many rollers that spread the load out. Keep in mind that stress is force/area (F/A) and a point load has 0 area. F / 0 is undefined. This is why @skunks used a rigid link at the load. I applied the load to surfaces representing the contact with the rollers. Let us say you allow 30MPa stress. From that and F/A you can calculate the minimum area of contact. For example 60kN / 2000 mm^2 = 30 MPa. Thus we need at least 2000 mm^2 of roller contact area to start with. To avoid other local bending of the beam flange, much more area and a spreading out is needed. Even with this much larger area (>30000 mm^2) I still have 70MPa. Maybe my next step is to upgrade the beam, or maybe even using IPN standard beam instead of HEA. (Or S-Section "American Standard Beam")
I have interest in this because someday I hope my garage will have a beam trolley. 🙂
