extra space when dual dimensioning

[sbugros]

When we use dual dimensioning there is an extra space added that is not desired.

it should look like this " M3 X .5" instead it looks like "M3 X .5"

[cid:image001.jpg@01CDC703.5B284ED0]

Has anybody seen this before?

Thanks

Steve



Steven Bugros
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Collider-Accelerator Department
Building 911 B
35 Lawrence Drive
Upton, N.Y. 11973
631-344-3259
bugros@bnl.gov


This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.

[sbugros]

We are using Creo Elements Pro 5 m160....

[#3]

Yes, it has to do with the font you are using. I couldn't get PTC to
open an SPR on it, maybe you can. You can either change font or usually
it is resolved if you "Stroke All Fonts" when you publish.



~Dan

[bokm9606]

Beware, "stroking all fonts" can create enormous PDFs

[Brndn_4]

We are experiencing the same problem and I have yet to figure out how to correct it. We're bound by our "required" font. I'd like to think that I shouldn't have to change my font to fix it and instead it just shouldn't be there or be fixed, but I know that's too much to ask from PTC sometimes. We're using Pro/E Wildfire 5.0, date code M050. Does anyone else have these issues with, say, Creo Parametric?

In Reply to Steven Bugros:

When we use dual dimensioning there is an extra space added that is not desired.

it should look like this " M3 X .5" instead it looks like "M3 X .5"

[cid:image001.jpg@01CDC703.5B284ED0]

Has anybody seen this before?

Thanks

Steve



Steven Bugros
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Collider-Accelerator Department
Building 911 B
35 Lawrence Drive
Upton, N.Y. 11973
631-344-3259
bugros@bnl.gov

[dgallup]

I don’t think there is anything you can do about it. The secondary unit with brackets is taking up the extra space. Pro/E has always done that with any font I’ve used.

My question is why doesn’t it have a secondary unit call out for the thread pitch?

In Reply to Brandon Foor:

We are experiencing the same problem and I have yet to figure out how to correct it. We're bound by our "required" font. I'd like to think that I shouldn't have to change my font to fix it and instead it just shouldn't be there or be fixed, but I know that's too much to ask from PTC sometimes. We're using Pro/E Wildfire 5.0, date code M050. Does anyone else have these issues with, say, Creo Parametric?

In Reply to Steven Bugros:

When we use dual dimensioning there is an extra space added that is not desired.

it should look like this " M3 X .5" instead it looks like "M3 X .5"

[cid:image001.jpg@01CDC703.5B284ED0]

Has anybody seen this before?

Thanks

Steve



Steven Bugros
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Collider-Accelerator Department
Building 911 B
35 Lawrence Drive
Upton, N.Y. 11973
631-344-3259
bugros@bnl.gov

PTC quality philosophy: We've upped our quality standards. Up yours.

[ptc-1932745]

On a similar vein, PTC may not be totally weird here, not having a
correct format for dual dimensioning a threaded hole, as I would expect
there is no equivalent to M3 X .5 in Imperial (or US units) and dual
dimensioning should not apply. If I were inspecting an M3 x .5 thread,
I would have to buy an appropriate thread gage and have the cert list
the compliance in metric units.



I wouldn't expect some type of metric dual dimensioning for a
.500-13UNC-2B hole as well. 12.7-.511UNC(?)-2B(?) would be so bad it's
not even wrong.







Christopher F. Gosnell



FPD Company

124 Hidden Valley Road

McMurray, PA 15317