cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

RBD Enhancement (Disjointing Feature Request and Explanation)

RBD Enhancement (Disjointing Feature Request and Explanation)

Please Read the attached Document for details.

Thank you

2 Comments
Emerald I

For those who don't want to read the whole document, here's the crux:

Providing disjointing or application of other Boolean techniques in this software tool is of paramount importance as the tool as it is now, provides results that cannot represent reliability and may lead to drastically incorrect results.

Seems like it might be worth taking an example where the output is completely incorrect and showing tech support.  These product ideas, especially really specific ones like this don't tend to go anywhere.  You need to figure out a way to push this up to a product manager (or higher).

Tanzanite

Clive,

following what Tom wrote, I suggest you to open a discussion in the community.

Sometimes you can have more in this way, than asking support.

See this SPR 2207900 – complain to PTC for BIG regression on Windchill 10.2