Support assemblies/parts with multi-owner links for BOM transfer to CED Annotation

[mschmidt1]

Today, in Windchill 12 it is only possible to do a BOM transfer to CED Annotation if a assembly/part have  a owner association to their part. If there are objects linked with image association the error "Picked geometry does not correspond to selected BOM component" is shown often.

For future versions it should be possible to use also objects with image-links for the correct representation of the drawing BOM in CED Modeling/Annotation.

See https://support.ptc.com/apps/case_logger_viewer/auth/ssl/case=16481489 

[olivierlp]

Thank you @mschmidt1  for publishing your idea. However, we need more information as specified in the form you saw in the submission process. (questions below). The more details and context you give to document your idea, the better. Think about ways to educate and convince other Community members to support your idea and present your case to the product management team for consideration.

Here are a few examples of well documented ideas:

Add Cascading Attribute Functionality/Support to C... - PTC Community

start Save As from Replace - PTC Community

Enable object update for multiple workspaces - PTC Community

You make a reference to a case number but users will not have access to it and won't be able to get the insights you intend.

Please let us know within the next two weeks.

1. Describe your environment: What is your industry? What is your role in your organization? Describe your stakeholders.
2. What product & version are you currently running?
3. Describe the problem you are trying to solve. Please include detailed documentation such as screenshots, images or video.
4. What is the use case for your organization?
5. What business value would your suggestion represent for your organization?

Additionally, I invite you to check out this topic where PTC executives explain product managers' approach to customer ideas and input for product roadmaps.

[olivierlp]

Hello,
We are following up on our request for additional information on your idea. In the absence of further comments from you, we are archiving your idea. You still have the option to post a new idea with all the details required.
Thank you.