Integrity Source: Share members via drag&drop

ssaul · ‎Apr 07, 2016

We are using many shared members that have to be added one after another to a new project via Member/Add from Archive.

It would be helpful to be able to use drag&drop to share members from one sandbox to another.

khoppe · ‎Apr 20, 2016

Since the requested Drag&Drop is -afaik- connected to the functionality MoveMember, the realisation of such a new functionality should be be done without affecting this one.

Also this requested function should be possible to be used as well in the Sandbox views as well as in the Project Views.

mrump · ‎May 12, 2016

IMHO a Copy&Paste Action would be preferable to Drap&Drop.

It would also be nice if the pasted member could be easily set to a "dynamic share", meaning the member rule to sync the revisions between the two shares.

Yes, the given functionality with the "ClientLink.js" Trigger works, but Setting these links up can be a p.i.t.a.

ssaul · ‎Dec 02, 2016

There exists already an RFC 439722 for this idea.

Siddharth · ‎May 03, 2017

Thanks for submitting this idea. However, PTC do not have any plans to work on this enhancement - based on future product roadmap for Integrity Lifecycle Manager.

khoppe · ‎May 03, 2017

RfC's (esp. older ones) as well as SPR's will be commented like following:

"Not part of Integrity's functionalities.

If you like to have such a function, please refer to Ideas ..."

Happened more than once to older cases of mine ...

Without any relating entry in the case itself.

khoppe · ‎May 03, 2017

Could you please provide more details, like part of roadmap which makes this idea not relevant for implementation?

I would like to understand, why this idea won't be implemented.

mrump · ‎May 03, 2017

can this decision be read as a "fade-out" strategy for Source, meaning that it will be maintained but not further enhanced?

Siddharth · ‎May 03, 2017

PTC is going to focus on the UI Replacement Project & this is our current roadmap. The area that you are mentioning is really UX in my opinion and specifically for Source. As you may be aware we have a UI Replacement Work Group that is operating currently and we would have a similar group when we get to Source UI Replacement - once that gets formed we will seek your inputs for Ideas like these, but there is no plan to implement this in the current GUI. We can still mark it For Future Consideration but we will not be looking at implementing this in the current UI

Siddharth · ‎May 03, 2017

I won't say that ! As mentioned above, we're not considering to implement this source related idea in current GUI format. When we get to new Source GUI - we shall be able to take up relevant ideas then.

khoppe · ‎May 04, 2017

Siddharth Somani schrieb:

(..) We can still mark it For Future Consideration (..)

Sounds good. Right now idea is still marked as "No Plans to implement"

Siddharth · ‎May 04, 2017

Changed to "For Future Considerations" !