At least since 10.5 there are some system internal fields
Name | Type | Description |
Review Sessions | relationship | Relates all Review Sessions to the segment root under review. This field is automatically added to a segment type when the segment is enabled for commenting. This field cannot be manually added to a type. |
Review Session For | relationship | Relates a Review Session to the segment root under review. This field is automatically added to a type when it is designated as a Review Session role. This field cannot be manually added to a type. |
Comment Text | longtext | Comment text provided by reviewers. This field is automatically added to a type when it is designated as a Comment role. This field cannot be manually added to a type. |
In Session | integer | Relates a Comment to a Review Session. This field is automatically added to a type when it is designated as a Comment role. This field cannot be added manually to a type. |
Comment For | integer | Relates a Comment to the segment root or node under review. This field is automatically added to a type when it is designated as a Comment role. This field cannot be manually added to a type. |
and also Commands in the Viewset config available which indicate that there is / or has been a development towards a item related review feature/framework.
Just guessing , I'd say it looks like a variation to the well know Test Management framework.
- define a Item Type that is marked as "Review Session"
- relate the review object (aka. a segment) and tread any node like a "test case"
- create "Review Comments" inside a review session(just like "Test Results") including a "Verdict" and a "Comment Text"
IMHO all this looks like a very promising approach and I would love to get my hands on it.
This carrot is hanging in front of users and admins for years now.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.