Pro/E WF3 M110 / Pro/I 3.4 M040
We're experiencing sporadic reliability issues with the content of BOM
reports extracted from Commonspace via either of these command sequences:
> Report; > BOM; > Structure;
and
> Report; > BOM; > Graph;
Although > Report; > BOM; > Report; has been working as expected ...
Most evident is that quantity numbers for components at lower dependency
levels don't match what we expect them to be based on the CAD BOM compiled
directly from Pro/E. The variance may be subtle (e.g. three units
reported instead of two) or it may be immediately recognizable (e.g. one
hundred units reported instead of ten).
Our preference is to continue using the "structure" genre of report in
Pro/I because of the indenturing that it offers however the danger in
using inaccurate data is too risky.
I'm trolling for someone to network with who may have already been down
this path ...
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Dustin Neifer
General Dynamics Land Systems
This is an e-mail from General Dynamics Land Systems. It is for the intended recipient only and may contain confidential and privileged information. No one else may read, print, store, copy, forward or act in reliance on it or its attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this message to the sender and delete the message and any attachments from your computer. Your cooperation is appreciated.
