Community Tip - Have a PTC product question you need answered fast? Chances are someone has asked it before. Learn about the community search. X
This customer reported that they see Non-Matching Variant during Configure steps for a configurable part.
But they don't know why.
Referred article CS133666, I understand that structure and IBAs are checked.
However I cannot reproduce to show Non-Matching Variant by changing IBA of child or usagelink.
Could anyone tell me simple way to create Non-Matching Variant without changing structure?
Thanks,
Tsutomu
Solved! Go to Solution.
Sorry for not updating this thread.
I have already worked with R&D and submitted SPR 7359802, after incident 7320112.
Yes, accodring to R&D, this could happen if the option set assigned to original part is changed(removed and added another name). This will not happen in future release(I'm not sure as I could not reproduce the issue)
Closing this thread.
Thanks,
Tsutomu
i met this message when the WTpart with the choice chosen did not exist in Windchill.
Sorry for not updating this thread.
I have already worked with R&D and submitted SPR 7359802, after incident 7320112.
Yes, accodring to R&D, this could happen if the option set assigned to original part is changed(removed and added another name). This will not happen in future release(I'm not sure as I could not reproduce the issue)
Closing this thread.
Thanks,
Tsutomu