cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - You can Bookmark boards, posts or articles that you'd like to access again easily! X

IntraLink 9.1 vs. PDMLink 9.1

snichols
2-Guest

IntraLink 9.1 vs. PDMLink 9.1

Hello WindChill Users,

We are looking at moving off our IntraLink 3.4 platform to PDMLink 9.1
or IntraLink 9.1 with in the next year. My first choice is PDMLink but
when looking at the cost of per-name users licenses vs. floating license
this become very expensive option. We are only going to use this tool as
a workgroup manager (Proe data only). I like the idea of custom work
flows and the visualization tools but I am not sure if it is worth the
cost..$$$$$

So, My question to the group is which one did you choose and why?

Thanks,
Stephen Nichols
CAE Application Support
HARRIS Corporation
Government Communications Systems Division
email: -


2 REPLIES 2

Stephen,



In my opinion, this is a tricky question with which you have to be
careful.



Strictly speaking, INTRALINK 8.0+ could actually be more expensive to
implement than PDMLink. This is because INTRALINK 8.0+ is really
neither named user nor concurrent user licensing.



PDMLink is pure named user licensing. And PTC has been willing to
exchange Pro/INTRALINK 3.x seats for some multiple of PDMLink seats to
accommodate the change in licensing approaches.



However, INTRALINK 8.0+ is not named user licensing. INTRALINK 8.0 uses
some odd, hybrid scheme. Connecting to INTRALINK 8.0 via Pro/ENGINEER
is controlled by flexLM. However, users can also access the INTRALINK
8.0 environment through a standalone web browser. Accessing through a
browser provides no license control!



As an example, suppose you have 30 users, ten seats of Pro/ENGINEER, and
ten seats of Pro/INTRALINK 3.x. Suppose you then change to 10 seats of
INTRALINK 9.1. You could connect to your INTRALINK 9.1 database with
ten seats of Pro/E. However, you could also then have ALL the rest of
your users connect via a browser. This situation would violate your
license agreement. However, you would not be able to stop the
violation. Moreover, you would not even know a violation occurred until
sometime later.



At least with PDMLink, there is no concurrent component. PDMLink has
pure named user licensing. PTC offers multiple seats of PDMLink for
each seat of 3.x, recognizing that more seats will be needed in this
named user mode. PTC has no such standard offer for INTRALINK 8.0+,
however.



The only compliant / ethical way to run INTRALINK 8.0+ seems to be to
have a 1:1 ratio of INTRALINK 8.0+ seats to users. I am betting that in
the 3.x world, most, if not all, companies have a 1:1 ratio of Pro/E to
Pro/I seats, but not a 1:1 ratio of users to seats.



PTC has refused to provide a technical or contractual solution to date.





Thanks.





Frank H. Strieffler,

Lead Member Engineering Staff



Mechanical Engineering

Lockheed Martin Engineering Process Improvement Center



Cherry Hill, NJ


Just a note; using Apache or IIS it is possible to limit the number of concurrent connections to a web server. Though I haven't tested this with IL 8+ it may be a reasonable method to control the number of concurrent users of Intralink 8+, not sure if PTC techs might comment on if this would work how I assume it would?

Ian Bagnald
System Support Analyst Sr.
Top Tags