Community Tip - You can subscribe to a forum, label or individual post and receive email notifications when someone posts a new topic or reply. Learn more! X
All,
I need to display a short text field of the first Item related on an Item (similar to an FVA but on a multiple to multiple relationship). Is is possible to us a computed field to accomplish this? I know that the short text is easily displayed, but I have not been able to find how to navigate the relationship to display it.
A trigger will not work in my case because once the item is released, it cannot be updated, preventing the trigger from updating the value. I also do not want the history updated because the related item was updated.
Thank you,
Paul
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi Paul,
here is my complete suggesion. I still believe (hope) its what you are looking for:
Field 1: RefSummary
Type: shorttext
Computation: getFieldValue(RefItemID, Summary)
Field 2: RefItemID
Type: integer
Add both fields to your Child Type.
Into RefItemID you put the parent ID from the item thats Summary you like to display.
When you update the relationship in A you also update (with a vers small trigger) the RefItemID, automatically.
Finally, item A will always display the latest Summary text from B.
Let me know if I missed something in my concept.
Volker
Hi Paul,
quite interesting request. Just to understand better:
a) you have an item A
b) A has a multi relationship to item Type B (1:n or n:m)
c) And, in A you like to see the summary from the first related item B?
Is this what you need?
Just a quick idea: you could define a hidden field (1:1 or n:1) and put via trigger the FIRST relationship also into it. Then, you could use the GetFieldValue formula to retrieve the Summary.
Perhaps, also just a plain integer field would work.
I hope you get the approach I am trying to explain.
Would you like to give a try?
Volker
Hi Paul
would you mind telling us your business case for this request, please? I am just interested.
Thank you
Volker,
I have a 1 to many relationship that currently has an FVA that displays information from 1 (parent) requirement on another (child). I need to convert the relationship to many to many, which is not supported by the FVA. I am looking for a way to continue to display the information on the child requirement without updating it.
The trigger option is less than ideal due to the fact that many of the requirements that display the information are locked and MUST not be updated and even if I wanted to they cannot be due to constraints. For example we have a constraint on which users may be in a field; when the user changes groups the constraint is no longer valid, but the field must not be updated to a valid users unless the requirement is in a CR, which may only include the parent and not the child.
With this in mind, what I would like to do is to display the value from one of the parents on the child. All parents will have the same value for this field, so it really does not matter which one is used.
Thank you,
Paul
Hi Paul,
here is my complete suggesion. I still believe (hope) its what you are looking for:
Field 1: RefSummary
Type: shorttext
Computation: getFieldValue(RefItemID, Summary)
Field 2: RefItemID
Type: integer
Add both fields to your Child Type.
Into RefItemID you put the parent ID from the item thats Summary you like to display.
When you update the relationship in A you also update (with a vers small trigger) the RefItemID, automatically.
Finally, item A will always display the latest Summary text from B.
Let me know if I missed something in my concept.
Volker
Hello Volker,
Thanks for your response "Display Text from a Related Item", actually I am looking for similar topic...
How can we Display a relationship Item ID's on same type ? Lets say We have Change Request --> Spawns --> Task, relationships.
Change Request 123 Spawns Task 201, Task 202, Task 203, We can see the ID's of Task type 201, 202 & 203 in CR's relationship tab in Spawns relationship in details. But here can we display that related only Task ID's 201, 202 & 203 in separate short text field on Change Request 123?
Kindly let me know.