Community Tip - You can subscribe to a forum, label or individual post and receive email notifications when someone posts a new topic or reply. Learn more! X
>>drv So you get around the public/private editing problem with the FOSI editor by working on the local laptop, but to test you then have to copy the FOSI over to custom/doctype area and place it with the DTD - is this correct? Reason I ask is I thought I would create a fosi-dev area in my custom folder, create a directory for each of the DTDs I manage and just put the FOSI I want to edit and test in that area. This doesn't seem to beworking - at least I can't get PE to recognize the path to the FOSI. I've made sure to try "associating" the FOSI with both a mapped drive letter and the UNC file path and neither are working.
The reason I tried setting this fosi-dev area up is I seem to be getting different results; almost like I have 2 different copies of the FOSI. One seems to be seen by the editor and the other by PE. I've created a simple bullet list item. This appears to at least put the bullet in place in the Editor view but doesn't produce anything in the PDF output.
I have an additional complication with this FOSI. I inherited this FOSI and it was setup to use some FOSI fragments/entities. So instead of 1 file I have about 7. The entities in the FOSI would have to be tweaked to point to the test version of the entities vs the released and I would have to remember to copy all the updated files over and change the paths to make it useable for everyone else.
Is this process as bad if you use styler? I'm about ready to bite the bullet on this and switch over.
I just tried using Architect with the fed command and it looks like it says I'm editing a private FOSI but I beleive I'm accessing the public FOSI.
***********************
While working on print FOSI changes (in most cases print and screen are the
same), I do development in:
z_dev.fos
Authors QA my work in:
z_test.fos
Production uses:
application.fos
These are stored in the PE custom folder stored locally on the server
hosting PE. Even if the FOSIs are the same, authors and PE are accessing
different physical copies. Sometimes I regret this!
Having to restart PE in 5.3 is going to be a pain. That used to interrupt
client DLM sessions. I haven't validated whether this is still true in 5.3
yet or not. The restart requirement may force me to involve operations staff
if I am unable to have access to the production environment.