Skip to main content
R
rnoah10-Marble
10-Marble
January 23, 2008
Question

Agile for managing Pro E Data.

  • January 23, 2008
  • 3 replies
  • 905 views
All,

Is there someone who use Agile (PDM System)to manage Pro E data directly, as a replecment forIntralink?

someone ever tested this possability?

any input will be appriciated.

Thanks,

Rami

    3 replies

    B
    brianlynn1-Visitor
    1-Visitor
    January 23, 2008
    Rami,

    We use Family Tables so unless Agile changes the way they work with those
    or we make the decision to move away from family tables, we will not be
    using Agile to manage our Pro/E files.

    We do use Agile to distribute mostly PDFs of our drawings a few DXFs get
    pass and a few word documents as specifications. We also use it to manage
    our B.o.M.s and Change Requests & Orders.

    I have forwarded a summary from Jim MacIntyre about how people are using
    Agile in conjunction with Pro/E.

    Brian S. Lynn
    Technical Coordinator, Product Engineering
    -----End Original Message-----
    K
    kveeser1-Visitor
    1-Visitor
    January 23, 2008
    Rami,

    We are considering alternatives to Intralink also. We looked at a software
    package called Design Data Manager. It seemed to work well with ProE and
    was very simple.
    www.designdatamanager.com

    Kevin

    Kevin Veeser
    Design Engineer
    Hatco Corporation




    "Rami Noah" <rami-n@orbotech.com>
    01/23/2008 03:50 PM
    Please respond to
    "Rami Noah" <rami-n@orbotech.com>


    To
    -
    cc

    Subject
    [proesys] - Agile for managing Pro E Data.






    All,
    Is there someone who use Agile (PDM System) to manage Pro E data
    directly, as a replecment for Intralink ?
    someone ever tested this possability?
    any input will be appriciated.
    Thanks,
    Rami
    -----End Original Message-----
    B
    BobSchwerdlin1-Visitor
    1-Visitor
    January 24, 2008
    I looked into DDM a few years ago and my biggest gripe was the fact that you
    cannot re-name any part, assembly or drawing from within the DDM software as
    you can in Pro/Intralink. To me this is a serious enough flaw that I had to
    pass on this program. In order to rename a part from an assembly, you still
    need to have the top level assembly(s) and drawing(s) in-session and re-name
    from within Pro/E (just like you do now). Bummer.

    I guess PTC does not want everyone to have open access to the database for
    naming conventions as such.

    Bob


    Terms & ConditionsCookie settingsAccessibility statement