On 9/10/2009 8:19:31 AM, raiko01 wrote:
>Honestly Tom, I don't
>understand where the fault
>is.
Of course, I've chosen
>error bars for two consecutive
>traces, but they don't
>show.
Am I missing
>something?
Raiko
P.S.
On
>second thought - the second
>data column provides the
>values for the error bars,
>right?
I was already wondering
>why the trace option didn't
>ask for an error range and
>assumed that it took something
>like a standard
>deviation.
Thanks for the
>hint
Raiko
You need 3 traces: the data, and the two (which should be consecutive) that represent the upper and lower error bounds.
Richard