Community Tip - Visit the PTCooler (the community lounge) to get to know your fellow community members and check out some of Dale's Friday Humor posts!
X
On 8/25/2009 5:25:18 AM, Armo wrote: == In the attached sheet I have used the symbolic solve operator to find the required variable. (m.gn) == I have heard people talking on this forum about defining a function that references your solve block, then use that function within your program. == Can anybody either confirm if this is possible or an alternative to the solve command.
I have attached a sheet of exactly what I am trying to do.
You can see that I have written the calculation in a program and used the answer from the solve function for m.gn, but, if possible I would like to incorporate the solve function into the program.
On 8/25/2009 9:44:25 AM, Armo wrote: >Yes cheers Richard. > >Spot on. > >Regards > >Mike ________________________
You three, are bombarding from too close range, I have to go for the day, get inspired by the green. No problem to include ranged 'r' !!! but a more involved way
On 8/25/2009 6:41:30 AM, Armo wrote: >I have attached a sheet of >exactly what I am trying to >do. > >You can see that I have >written the calculation in a >program and used the answer >from the solve function for >m.gn, but, if possible I would >like to incorporate the solve >function into the program. > >Regards > >Mike ______________________________
This is not a case of passing a solve block in a programme. Below Marlett is a case of passing a solver in a programme. Colebrook that I passed is a case of passing a solver in a programme and iterating for a family of solutions. You better go yellow "the Engineer way". You can't resist plugging units ... is it ? !!! Always check any function by plotting.