On 1/21/2010 9:10:29 AM, jmG wrote:
>You have several points that may end to
>full collaboration.
>
>1. In TRACER , you set the data range
>from the menu.
Here, don't need searching in the menu where, it is in the worksheet. Values are showed for printing, and not remain hidden.
>2. Select the data and paste directly
>to a Mathcad input table.
That's your preference, not mine.
>3. Microsoft has mentioned that scripted
>components may not all work from version
>to version.
I check the component in mathcad 14 before posting. Even I don't know this opinion from Microsoft can't why this a point where " that may end to full collaboration " as you say.
>I would reject using a trace tracking
>directly in a single Mathcad work sheet
>for safety reasons. Serious work need be
>proofed for a complete and separate
>traceability. Plots are not all that
>simple and unique as the demo in
>context. Go few steps ahead and embed a
>code to delete the clicking session, for
>instance [Ctrl]+[Alt] F12 (per say).
There are a lot of things that can be added to the component but I think that if the user don't need they are only for make the code obscure and long. There are a 'further development' section at the end where some few ideas are writing.
>The zoom cross hair in TRACER makes all
>its mighty power !
With a microsoft component you can change the cursor face. It is question only of changing the source.
>Unless you recode TRACER completely as a
>scripted component, I can't see how you
>can make a "Mathcad TRACER".
You can't, maybe others can. And I recode nothing, the code in basic is short, simple and robust. Only use the standard mathcad features for the component, documented in the developer center help, implemented in direct way, without calling nothing that are not usual for this kind of applications.
>Doing so
>would end as reverse Engineering and not
>legal (most probably), and might be
>deleted by the webmaster, unless PTC
>would obtain a licence for future
>Mathcad versions. But this collab is
>seemingly not the property of of PTC ?
But because I don't need to recode nothing I will never to do reverse engineering with the tracer tool.
>Will read your next version after more
>collabs have read and confirmed safe
>from viruses, as per our long discussion
>some time ago.
The procedure to do the component is described in the worksheet, so can be duplicated for any reader without running the attached work.
>A *.DLL would be much
>better in lieu of the scripted
>component, same applies to a lot of the
>features on the "wish list".
Hard to make changes in a user dll, include if source code is provide.
Regards. Alvaro.