Thin part: sheet metal or not sheet metal

[akelly]

We have an existing part made from sheet metal.  I'm stumped whether or not it's a Creo "sheet metal" part.  I've watched some tutorials and none of them seem to be close to this use case.  I'd rather not have to make punches and dies.

Also, as a sheet metal part, I can't figure out how to model to the finished dimensions without creating dummy waste material with dummy dimensions that you have to get rid of at the end of the model.  Seems like poor Creo practice.

As a solid part, you could brute-force this as a single revolve feature.  It's bordering on poor practice having that many segments in the sketch.  Ideally there's a "better" way?

If you try to use a thin feature instead of a solid feature, the dimensioning scheme doesn't work.  Some dimensions are to the inside surface while others are to the outside surface. 

Also, I hate flexible modeling.  You should be able to do this in either as a solid part or sheet metal part on their own.

Sorry for the bad sketch.  It's a round part - I sketched a half section.

[KenFarley]

Judging from the sketch I'd say it was likely punched in a progressive die of some sort, Looks like the bottom of a pressurized can, like shaving cream or something like that.  If it was purely a part made from spinning sheet metal or some process like that I'd expect radii at the shorter side of the "U" at the top.

Can't you just ask the person who is making these what the method is? That would settle a lot of things.

Seems like a model of the part is always going to be a bit of an idealization, since you probably won't model any "draw" or thinning of the material due to extruding or deformations, etc.

As for section complexity, I don't understand what you're talking about. 9 entities in a sketch is hardly any. I would model this as a single revolve. It's not "brute-force", it's just straightforward modeling.