cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community email notifications are disrupted. While we are working to resolve, please check on your favorite boards regularly to keep up with your conversations and new topics.

Cut in two piece

DenisJaunin
15-Moonstone

Cut in two piece

Hello

I do a test simply with a washer, see the sketch enclosed.

I do the simulation with the whole puck and then with half of the puck as well as half of the load.

And I get not the same result to Von Mises:

Entire puck 750.0 [MPa]

Puck half 642.0 [MPa]

When you cut a piece in half to do more than the symmetrical connection.

Kind regards.

Denis

7 REPLIES 7
346gnu
12-Amethyst
(To:DenisJaunin)

Hi Denis,

Where are your stresses measured?

Do the contact forces balance/add up?

How is your F1 & F2 applied?

atb

DenisJaunin
15-Moonstone
(To:346gnu)

Good morning Charles.

In reality the force F1 is the support reaction of the force F2.

I have an F1 support that is done on a dia crown. Ext of 42.0 [mm] and dia int of 30.0 [mm].

The force F2 of 30 [KN] acts on a ring of dia ext of 30.0 [mm] and dia int of 23.0 [mm]

Thickness of washer 3.25 [mm]

Cordially.

Denis

test 2d

Regards

Paul

Hello Paul,

Thanks for this very interesting answer in its design, I take

good note.

I am attaching a picture of the representation of the puck split in half with the

a half load whose constraints are not identical.

As stated in the first post.

I may be forgetting to do something when you cut a piece by

its plane of symmetry.

Kind regards.

Denis

Hello Denis,

OK, maybe 2d contact better?

contact_2d.jpg

Hello

Thank you for your new shipment.

I'm going to watch it.

But what I still don't understand, is why when I simulates half a piece by the plane of symmetry, I do not get the same results.

Kind regards.

Denis

Hello Denis,

your model is wrong, half too,

not constraints possible, contact only.

Regards

Paul

Top Tags