Then add the other known value of type=manual along with the third test I
know have to test and things just start to grow to an unmanagble list of
values. My type actually has about 10 values right now, not sure if I need
to do something special for each one, but they are specified by name. So
I'm now trying to set up the FOSI to allow for these possible variations.
The programmer in me wants to keep it simple and neat and have a single
statement that covers the same situation
> So, having 3 atts with two specvals each, with all 3 atts doing the same
> thing wouldn't work?
>
> <att>
> <specval attname="type" attval="\checklist\">
> <specval attname="foo" attval="1">
> [do thing number 1]
> </att>
> <att>
> <specval attname="type" attval="\checklist\">
> <specval attname="foo" attval="2">
> [do thing number 1]
> </att>
> <att>
> <specval attname="type" attval="\checklist\">
> <specval attname="foo" attval="3">
> [do thing number 1]
> </att>
>