Community Tip - Stay updated on what is happening on the PTC Community by subscribing to PTC Community Announcements. X
Please copy the question below that most resonates with you with your answer in your reply. (It counts towards your Sustainability Badge!)
-How does the book define sustainability in the context of product life cycles?
-How do compliance and profitability drive sustainability efforts?
Personal Impact: How has your understanding of sustainability evolved over time, and what specific experiences have influenced your perspective?
Register for Sustainability Chat with PTC VP Dave Duncan June 26!
How does the book define sustainability in the context of product life cycles?
Sustainability is much more than what is done within the walls of a manufacturer. You must consider everything from the source of the raw materials to what happens to the product after its useful life is done.
Personally, I have at times, paid attention to what happens to something that is no longer useful, and I need to dispose of it. Many things are full of reusable materials but are very difficult to separate into separate parts that can be recycled. Some things can be separated, with some effort, but can the resulting small pieces get recycled? Small items on the recycling belt often fall though or are not picked out for recycling. Also, many materials are recyclable but there is not enough of a market to make it valuable enough to deal with. That which does not get recycled ends up buried in the landfill. And there are many things that just cannot be recycled or separated.
I have deconstructed many toys, machines, pieces of furniture, etc. (with help from the children) to recycle as much as possible. How much actually made it into the raw material stream is anyone's guess.
I agree with your observations about the frustrations of recycling. Disassembly is difficult when it's not premeditated in design. Pieces can be small, and it's destination varies based on collection location. To drive circularity, designers, manufactures, and service teams need to aspire to higher "Re-X" levels than recycling - reduce, repair, refurbish, and remanufacture. These levels can have more reliable follow through and higher value. But recycling remains an important #5 where obsolescence products and consumables are needed - much to figure out there.
Another area that many times falls short is quality/durability. Many products are built with cost being the priority leading to short life spans. I try to buy better quality products but many times a quality version is either hard to find, hard to determine before buying, or nonexistent.
Yes, durability/circularity should be more transparent for buyers and differentiating for the selling manufacturers. Digital Product Passports hold a lot of promise for this. These passports are more mass-market readable than their predecessors like Environmental Product Declarations. Check out the Industrial Digital Twin Association (IDTA) work on the passport topic and the adoption its building for its underlying Asset Administration Shell (AAS) data exchange standard. Passports will be a strong business driver towards better footprints, including durability - B2C approaches can include QR codes on products to help with consumer choices. B2B can have more.