We don't have any sort of sophisticated graphics management. We simply
have a naming convention for files, and we basically use a number at the
end of the filename to identify the version of the graphic. Our writers
call out the graphics by filename, and they know what version they want
(99.99% of the time, it's the latest version).
Our graphics are on a Unix server. There are slightly more than 28,000
files occupying about 11 G of storage space.
We use EPS graphics with no bitmap preview, which are not displayable in
Epic/Arbortext Editor. This cuts down on performance issues. If the
writers want to see what the graphic looks like in the document, they
can compose PDF and look at it. If an output requires a different,
non-EPS format, we transform the graphic reference to the same filename
with a different file extension and use that file, which is stored in
the same place as all the other EPS graphics.
Our writers have never, ever used a WYSIWYG authoring system, so have
never complained about not having any of the features available in Word
or Framemaker, etc.
Even in the 1980's they were using a markup-type system, with square
brackets to denote typesetting commands. They used to need to queue
their documents to a printer, wait for the result, and make changes
based on that. Today's system is much quicker, but they still don't
have WYSIWYG and still don't miss it, because they never had it.
If we have any new hires that start to complain that Arbortext Editor is
"not like Word", we beat them until they stop complaining.