cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Did you know you can set a signature that will be added to all your posts? Set it here! X

Why doesn't FindDataTableEntries work with multiple values is given Values infotable

ahanchat
7-Bedrock

Why doesn't FindDataTableEntries work with multiple values is given Values infotable

When I happen to use FindDataTableEntries on DataTable, by setting multiple rows in Values Infotable, I get an error as below

Unable to Invoke Service FindDataTableEntries on WA_SampleGuidNameProductionValueTable : Invalid Number of values provided to FindDataTableEntries in WA_SampleGuidNameProductionValueTable

But FindDataTableEntries work for single row in Values infotable.

6 REPLIES 6
Aanjan
9-Granite
(To:ahanchat)

Anirudha, I believe FindDataTableEntries input parameter is not intended to work with a multiple row infotable. It only accepts a single row infotable, tries to match the specified values and then print them.

ahanchat
7-Bedrock
(To:Aanjan)

Ok, Then which service to use if I have multiple values.

I tried using QueryDataTableEntries as below, but I don't get any values. What is the right way to use QueryDataTableEntries?

I appreciate your reply, I am stuck into an critical issue and it is affecting our production server. Please help.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

var str1 = "19be81d24259853a99fc15fdcda63934521bae29";

var str2 = "2052527c1afe8af884d387d544ab2d2b3c0e1ab9";

var jsonArray = [str1, str2];

var query = {

    filters: {

        type : "EQ",

        fieldName : "guid",

        values: jsonArray

    }

};

var values = me.CreateValues();

var params = {

    maxItems: undefined /* NUMBER */,

    values: values /* INFOTABLE*/,

    query: query /* QUERY */,

    source: undefined /* STRING */,

    tags: undefined /* TAGS */

};

// result: INFOTABLE dataShape: "undefined"

var result = me.QueryDataTableEntries(params);

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Please note that there is typo, The type I have used is "IN"

Maybe you can call FindDataTableEntries twice (once for each different value), and then join the results together.

If I try doing a call FindDataTableEntries twice (once for each different value), and then join the results together, then showhow I am getting an error in the stack due to which the CPU is getting utilized heavily.

The code snippet is as below

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

for (var x = 0; x < tableLength; x++) {

    var str = scns.rows.strVal.toString();

   

    var values = me.CreateValues();

    values.str= str; //STRING

    var params = {

        values: values /* INFOTABLE*/

    };

    // result: INFOTABLE dataShape: "undefined"

    var queryresult = me.FindDataTableEntries(params);

   

    var tableSize = queryresult.rows.length;

    for (var x = 0; x < tableSize; x++) {

        var entry = new Object();       

        entry.guid = queryresult.rows.guid.toString();

        entry.guidname = queryresult.rows.guidname.toString();

        result.AddRow(entry)

    }

}

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

The stacktrace is as below.


"ajp-nio-8009-exec-4" #355 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007f0958008000 nid=0x5e72 runnable [0x00007f0a52988000]

   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE

        at java.lang.StringCoding.decode(StringCoding.java:229)

        at java.lang.String.<init>(String.java:463)

        at java.lang.String.<init>(String.java:515)

        at com.thingworx.common.utils.EnhancedDataInputStream.readUTF8(EnhancedDataInputStream.java:35)

        at com.thingworx.types.primitives.StringPrimitive.readFromStream(StringPrimitive.java:98)

        at com.thingworx.types.BaseTypes.ReadPrimitiveFromStream(BaseTypes.java:736)

        at com.thingworx.types.data.util.ValueCollectionSerializer.fromBinary(ValueCollectionSerializer.java:89)

        at com.thingworx.types.data.util.ValueCollectionSerializer.fromByteArray(ValueCollectionSerializer.java:136)

        at com.thingworx.persistence.neo4j.factories.data.NeoDataEntryDataProvider.readDataEntryFromNeo(NeoDataEntryDataProvider.java:61)

        at com.thingworx.persistence.neo4j.factories.data.NeoDataTableEntryDataProvider.getDataTableEntry(NeoDataTableEntryDataProvider.java:289)

        at com.thingworx.persistence.neo4j.factories.data.NeoDataTableEntryDataProvider.rawQueryEntries(NeoDataTableEntryDataProvider.java:242)

        at com.thingworx.persistence.neo4j.factories.data.NeoDataTableEntryDataProvider.queryEntries(NeoDataTableEntryDataProvider.java:528)

        at com.thingworx.persistence.neo4j.factories.data.NeoDataTableEntryDataProvider.queryEntries(NeoDataTableEntryDataProvider.java:538)

        at com.thingworx.persistence.common.DataTableEngine.lambda$findEntries$69(DataTableEngine.java:229)

        at com.thingworx.persistence.common.DataTableEngine$$Lambda$60/580017954.get(Unknown Source)

        at com.thingworx.persistence.common.BaseEngine.createTransactionAndReturn(BaseEngine.java:174)

        at com.thingworx.persistence.common.DataTableEngine.findEntries(DataTableEngine.java:226)

        at com.thingworx.datatables.DataTableThing.FindDataTableEntries(DataTableThing.java:738)

        at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor93.invoke(Unknown Source)

        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)

        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497)

        at com.thingworx.common.processors.ReflectionProcessor.processService(ReflectionProcessor.java:119)

        at com.thingworx.handlers.ReflectionServiceHandler.processService(ReflectionServiceHandler.java:47)

        at com.thingworx.things.Thing.processServiceRequestDirect(Thing.java:4578)

        at com.thingworx.things.Thing.processServiceRequest(Thing.java:4501)

        at com.thingworx.dsl.engine.adapters.VirtualFunction.call(VirtualFunction.java:131)

        at org.mozilla.javascript.optimizer.OptRuntime.call1(OptRuntime.java:32)

        at org.mozilla.javascript.gen.WA_getGuidAndGuidNames2Columns_922._c_script_0(WA_getGuidAndGuidNames2Columns:21)

        at org.mozilla.javascript.gen.WA_getGuidAndGuidNames2Columns_922.call(WA_getGuidAndGuidNames2Columns)

        at org.mozilla.javascript.gen.WA_getGuidAndGuidNames2Columns_922.exec(WA_getGuidAndGuidNames2Columns)

        at com.thingworx.dsl.engine.DSLProcessor.executeService(DSLProcessor.java:154)

        at com.thingworx.dsl.DSLServiceHandler.processService(DSLServiceHandler.java:38)

        at com.thingworx.things.Thing.processServiceRequestDirect(Thing.java:4578)

        at com.thingworx.things.Thing.processServiceRequest(Thing.java:4501)

        at com.thingworx.dsl.engine.adapters.VirtualFunction.call(VirtualFunction.java:131)

        at org.mozilla.javascript.optimizer.OptRuntime.call1(OptRuntime.java:32)

        at org.mozilla.javascript.gen.WA_getGuidNames_948._c_script_0(WA_getGuidNames:20)

        at org.mozilla.javascript.gen.WA_getGuidNames_948.call(WA_getGuidNames)

        at org.mozilla.javascript.ContextFactory.doTopCall(ContextFactory.java:394)

        at org.mozilla.javascript.ScriptRuntime.doTopCall(ScriptRuntime.java:3090)

        at org.mozilla.javascript.gen.WA_getGuidNames_948.call(WA_getGuidNames)

        at org.mozilla.javascript.gen.WA_getGuidNames_948.exec(WA_getGuidNames)

        at com.thingworx.dsl.engine.DSLProcessor.executeService(DSLProcessor.java:154)

        at com.thingworx.dsl.DSLServiceHandler.processService(DSLServiceHandler.java:38)

        at com.thingworx.things.Thing.processServiceRequestDirect(Thing.java:4578)

        at com.thingworx.things.Thing.processAPIServiceRequest(Thing.java:4513)

        at com.thingworx.webservices.BaseService.handleInvoke(BaseService.java:2513)

        at com.thingworx.webservices.BaseService.service(BaseService.java:306)

        at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:729)

Thanks

Anirudha

your code uses 'x' for both loops

Top Tags