Alternatives to Windchill for Creo CAD management

Forum|Forum|12 years ago
April 17, 2014
2 replies
10550 views

Greetings,

I am looking for customer cases where either Enovia (Dassault) or Agile (Oracle) are being used as an alternative to Windchill, particularly CAD data management.

We are evaluating consolidation of PDMs as we own all three. I am specifically looking for what to expect as far as pitfalls, workarounds, limitations, etc. as pertaining to the use of Creo Parametric, Schematic, View, Illustrate, etc.

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Other

C

Cavallini

1-Visitor

I am working on the latest Enovia V6 2013 version with Creo2 parametric. The install uses third party CAD integration tool (previoulsy known as MxPro). I have been told that our Enovia install has been heavily modified to function as it does. I am not sure what the Enovia out of the box feature set looks like, so I can judge only what I use against PDMlink:

1. Enovia Workspaces: File status not given. Only tells you folder status for content removed or added. Very different from what PTC Windchill calls workspace. No benefit for collaboration.

2. No direct (live) connection to the Enovia vault. You work from your hard drive through windows explorer.

3. Many operations to determine manipulate objects: OPEN window, UPDATE, CHECK STATUS and are in different windows.

4. Files must be copied from Enovia to HD and not moved from that folder to maintain link to database to perform updates/checkin files.

5. The OPEN screen is presented as the means to interface with the vault as you would in PDMlink workspace. Really, its just a "checkout" screen which means to get a copy from the vault.

6. ET AL.....

The summary of my interaction with Enovia: it has some of the tools that are available in PDMlink but the interface is inefficient which undermines users from following best practices and prevents truely collaborative efforts (especially with medium to large assemblies with several contributors). We found that most divisions utilize a CAD project manager position on each mechanical design project whose focus is maintenance of file changes/file status. Seems for the cost of a PLM system, that Enovia would step up and provide an out of the box pilot test install for you to gain some knowledge against the competition you have access. Kick the tires hard on this one

P

ProEmonkey

1-Visitor

Dale,

I would like to find out more about your experiences with Enovia V6 managing Creo 2 Parametric. I know somewhat about the integration I have seen some demos. Our parent company is moving to Enovia V6 and Catia V6 but we our primary CAD tool is Creo 2.0 Parametric. Can you share any information about your company / name? How large is your organization? We have quite a large user base ~ 300 engineers using Creo and our concern is the day to day interaction / performance of Enovia V6 and Creo. We have not made any decisions and could potentially use Windchill directly with Creo. Any information you can provide would be helpful. Thanks.

K

Kainjfr69

8-Gravel

Hi
We are currently in purchasing process for a Plm solution who could work with creo 5 or 6, and also Catia for the other engineering department.
Our final choice will be between Windchill vs Enovia.
And for the moment the price is better for Enovia and our IT and Catia users are pushing for it.
I have already worked with windchill in previous company, and i liked it, but for Enovia i am a bit afraid of no full compatibility and maybe other things that I don't know.
That's why I am very interested of your feedback with enovia and creo?
Does it work well? Family table etc...?
Than you

M

mreid

1-Visitor

Hey Cameron,

I use Oracle Agile 9 in conjunction with the xPLM MCAD integration tool; it manages both our SolidWorks and Creo 2 CAD through the same software where the xPLM interface is near identical between each system. The main pit-fall i've seen with Agile lies with the user interface; neither the xPLM tool nor Agile itself is particularly intuitive....training...more training....

Thoughts:

Agile can automatically update item BOMs, creates nonnative formats for CAD (.STEP, .IGS, etc.) and publish .PDFs for all the drawings; also it fills out the title block data for drawings.

(Like the Enovia system) CAD is updated on the user's local hard drive and then saved to the Agile server. The user's need to be trained to delete old CAD from their HD, before later accessing the CAD from the Agile server. This is especially important when comparing different versions of the same models.

Managing large assemblies without a unique part number from Agile for each component is messy (and files get lost). I have restricted the ability to save CAD to Agile unless a unique part number for each CAD file has already been created. It creates a lot of front-end work which the designers do not enjoy.

I needed to hire a third party to script a revision control function for CAD files. Out-of-the-Box function for CAD ("Design Objects") does not follow the same workflow/release as other items in Agile, and there is not an easy way to disallow "check-out" privilege for users. Now though, CAD designs directly follow the item workflows; and the system is extremely efficient for tracking and implementing changes.