cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community email notifications are disrupted. While we are working to resolve, please check on your favorite boards regularly to keep up with your conversations and new topics.

Stepped revision system in Windchill

Dennis_V_NL
5-Regular Member

Stepped revision system in Windchill

Dear all,

 

Is it possible to use a stepped revision system in Windchill? You start for instance with component 123400A.1

- Checking in give 123400A.2

- You release the file, and need to get a minor update.

- You do a "new-small-revision" and get 123400B.1.

- You release the file and need to get a big update.

- You do a "new-big-revision" and get 123401A.1

 

In a structure that includes this component you view based on "latest" and 123401A.1 is shown.

 

Because there is a chance that this is not possible. An alternative:

- You use the normal revise to get from 123400A.2 to 123400B.1

- If you need a big revision you save as the parts and files to 123401A.1.

- Because of the naming convention you know the 01 is later than the 00.

- You can use substitutes  or replacements to show a user who is looking at the 00 that there is a 01 available.

But if you have a structure with the 123400 how are you able to show the 123401 as the latest?

 

Best regards,

Dennis Varkevisser

Flexible Engineering Support

1 REPLY 1
avillanueva
22-Sapphire II
(To:Dennis_V_NL)

yes but you are likely going to need to use a file based version scheme and define all ordered possibilities. IMHO, keep it simple. Major or minor, a revision is a revision. All revisions are interchangeable and "generally" minor. If not, change part number, sometimes called configuration number but its part of the part number. these are generally FFF changes and bigger. 

Top Tags