Community Tip - Did you know you can set a signature that will be added to all your posts? Set it here! X
I am working with lifting equipment and need to model lifting slings. Creating a straight lifting sling is very simple when using the circumference dimension and letting the centre-centre distance be variable. See the picture below.
The challenge is creating a similar sling, but with a 90° twist. I have tried the pipe feature, sweep and swept blend, but I haven't succeded in creating is as one feature. It is possible to create it with two features, but it isn't very elegant. See the attached model.
Is there an elegant way to create a twisted sling? And is it possible to control the curve length and keep it constant?
Looking forward to some good ideas.
/Niels
ya its ok
Maybe you have already tried this, but well...
You are able to create that using only two features. Define the curve and then use a Sweep feature. But! You will have to press the button shown in the picture in order create a succeed sweep. Otherwise, it won't work. For keeping the curve length constant, I don't know the answer 😃
Hi,
if I understand you well the root of the problem is How to get 3D curve with specific length ?. I think you can solve this problem, but the solution is little bit complicated.
My suggestion:
For inspiration see attached model. The problem solved in it is What is the water level height, when the bottle contains 1 litter of water ?
Info related to my model (created in CR2 M070):
MH
About your model twisted i see there's not tangency in some points and with curves you don't have total control of transition of guide curve.
Take a look at attached model.
There are a lot of variables not known to come up with an accurate answer.
If an approximation is sufficient, here goes:
(d1) Make the sketch with the perimeter measure as before and note the distance between the axes of the end radii.
(d2) Now make the sketch with a cross-over to represent 180 degree rotation and again, note the distance of the axes at the end radii.
You can use the distance as a linear interpolation of the difference between the two noted values (d1-d2=d3), assigning 1/180th of the difference (d3) to each degree of rotation.
With the value between axes and the angle, you have the motion path for the secondary axis.
Of course, if that leaves another degree of freedom for the secondary axis, the error will increase, but not by much if the position is essentially the same.
Again, accurate models are not nearly as easy to obtain but this method can be broken down into more and more relevant data.
Now would be a good time to have a 3D sketch available in Creo like they have in SolidWorks
I'd suggest using an evaluate curve as part of your solution. Or maybe a wrap? Unlike a project, it should keep the curve length constant. This looks fun, and I'd LOVE to look at it....but they had yet another round of layoffs the other day......
Best of luck!