Skip to main content
D
DaltonF.1-Visitor
1-Visitor
July 18, 2014
Solved

Motion Skeleton Integration

  • July 18, 2014
  • 1 reply
  • 3527 views

Lets assume that this example has one putting a bearing onto an output shaft, driven by an input shaft through a set of gears. The large scale motion skeleton is set up, and works to allow the output shaft to rotate after defining gear connections.

I want to simulate the motion of the bearing carrier, but is it possible to crate a motion skeleton within the bearing assembly then assembly it onto the larger Gear reducer assembly, or will I have to assembly it piece by piece? I want to allow myself to auto populate the BOM by the features contained inside the model, and to do this the bearing has to be assembled before it is put on.

The only way I've done it before is to assembly the carrier onto the shaft separately from the inner and outer race, which causes it to show up in the model tree as two separate parts (in reality the bearing is pressed on as a single feature). Any ideas how to do this?

Currently, I am defining the bearing as a Gear Pair through a Motion skeleton, and the gear pair definition occurs inside the bearing assembly. Do I just need to change where the gear pair definition occurs, or is there some other proble.

Any advice is great help.

Thanks


This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.
Best answer by TomD.inPDX

Your considerations in the original post are correct. its a real mindbender to get this all to function and it takes only a small error in judgement to lock the whole system up.

1 reply

D
DaltonF.1-VisitorAuthor
1-Visitor
July 23, 2014

If anyone is reading this, there is a way to do this. I was able to figure it out. There are actually a couple of different methods, which all are useful for certain applications. Let me know if you need help

T
TomD.inPDX17-PeridotAnswer
17-Peridot
July 23, 2014

Your considerations in the original post are correct. its a real mindbender to get this all to function and it takes only a small error in judgement to lock the whole system up.

D
DaltonF.1-VisitorAuthor
1-Visitor
July 23, 2014

Basically, I had to assembly everything using plane and axis connections, using extra connections after the part was fully constrained (setting different planes rigidly to the motion skeleton parts). Then, the assmebly as a whole was attached in the same manor to the correct planes in the high level skeleton, and boom. It works, and well might I add.

I altered a bit and used your mechanism link check for the ball bearings as well. It was all done primarily through motion skeletons, though, so that it is more adept to fitting into a top down design methodology (mechanism links positively will not operate top down, so there is some user alterations, but not nearly to the level that I imagined there would be).

On a separate note, do you know of any references on tandem part creation? For example, creating the helical sweep of a worm drive and the gear to go with it.

Terms & ConditionsCookie settingsAccessibility statement