cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Did you get an answer that solved your problem? Please mark it as an Accepted Solution so others with the same problem can find the answer easily. X

Solidworks ScanTo3D vs. Reverse Engineering Extension

mlindqvist
12-Amethyst
12-Amethyst
‎Sep 15, 2016 04:38 AM
‎Sep 15, 2016 04:38 AM

Solidworks ScanTo3D vs. Reverse Engineering Extension

Possibly not the right forum, but I'm stuck with Solidworks ScanTo3D to handle scanned point clouds. I'm having issues with poor performance / crashing software.

How does Creo Reverse Engineering Extension handle this?

Does anyone have any experience from this?

Labels:
0 Kudos
Notify Moderator
1 REPLY 1
danderson
12-Amethyst
12-Amethyst
(To:mlindqvist)
‎Sep 15, 2016 05:36 AM
‎Sep 15, 2016 05:36 AM

Hi Mats,

I have had good results with 3DReshaper allowing me to take point cloud data remove noise, smooth out points and make a water tight step file. You still wind up with a buch of surface triangles . I add protrusions where i want to add loads and constraints just to make setting up simulations easier. Have found it to be quicker to work with CT Scan and White light scan point clouds in regards to making solid models from points.

Don Anderson

Notify Moderator
Announcements
NEW Creo+ Topics: Real-time Collaboration


Contact Community Management
Top Tags