Community Tip - Want the oppurtunity to discuss enhancements to PTC products? Join a working group! X
Hi guys,
I need a little help. I have run a simple simulation of a bolt under different loads. The UTS of the steel of the bolt is 530 MPa and each bolt is loaded with 265 MN. My results show three windows, one which is Stress Von mises, the second displacement and the third stress max prin.
Am I correct in thinking that the first is showing the areas of stress? Im confused since this appears to be up to 182 GPa.
The second is showing how far the bolt would be deformed and stretched and the third how the stress is mapped,how does this differ from the first one. I have been unable to find this information on the PTC site. Any help would be much appreciated.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Am I correct in thinking that the first is showing the areas of stress? Im confused since this appears to be up to 182 GPa.
You are correct. The first windows shows a fringe plot of the von-Mises stress throughout the geometry. Von-Mises stress is a scalar (ie no direction) quantity and yielding (ie permanent deformation) will occur for ductal materials when the von-Mises stress exceeds the Yield Strength of the material.
The 182 GPa value is the peak stress, which could very well be artificially high due to stress singularities; reentrant corners (corners with a mathematical 90 deg edge) will produce stress singularities, resulting in infinitely high stress at the edge. However, in the real world, there is no such thing as a perfect 90 deg edge; there is always some type of fillet present. There are also other modeling conditions that can cause singularities, and an analyst can spend a significant amount of time on a FEA model to ensure that any singularities are handled correctly and that converged results are obtained.
I also want to point out that it looks like Window1 is an animation, and that the stress fringe plot you see is for frame 5 of 8; this means the stress field you're seeing is essentially at 5/8ths of your applied load. Frame 8 of 8 will show the results for 100% of the load.
and the third how the stress is mapped,how does this differ from the first one
The third window is showing the maximum principle stress. The maximum principle stress is a vector quantity (ie it has a direction associated with it) and defines a the maximum tensile stress within the geometry. Material fracturing occurs typically when the maximum principle stress exceeds the ultimate tensile stress of brittle materials.
The second is showing how far the bolt would be deformed
Correct, but I have a feeling that something is wrong with your analysis, as the bolt is deflecting over 0.4 m (over a foot). It's possible that this value is right, but that would only be the case if your bolt is really big (around 2.25 m in length, which I doubt).
I'd be happy to review your analysis and provide feedback if you can post the model itself and a describe the situation that you're trying to simulate.
Hey Marcus - I've moved this post into our Simulation community so that others can offer their expert advice.
Am I correct in thinking that the first is showing the areas of stress? Im confused since this appears to be up to 182 GPa.
You are correct. The first windows shows a fringe plot of the von-Mises stress throughout the geometry. Von-Mises stress is a scalar (ie no direction) quantity and yielding (ie permanent deformation) will occur for ductal materials when the von-Mises stress exceeds the Yield Strength of the material.
The 182 GPa value is the peak stress, which could very well be artificially high due to stress singularities; reentrant corners (corners with a mathematical 90 deg edge) will produce stress singularities, resulting in infinitely high stress at the edge. However, in the real world, there is no such thing as a perfect 90 deg edge; there is always some type of fillet present. There are also other modeling conditions that can cause singularities, and an analyst can spend a significant amount of time on a FEA model to ensure that any singularities are handled correctly and that converged results are obtained.
I also want to point out that it looks like Window1 is an animation, and that the stress fringe plot you see is for frame 5 of 8; this means the stress field you're seeing is essentially at 5/8ths of your applied load. Frame 8 of 8 will show the results for 100% of the load.
and the third how the stress is mapped,how does this differ from the first one
The third window is showing the maximum principle stress. The maximum principle stress is a vector quantity (ie it has a direction associated with it) and defines a the maximum tensile stress within the geometry. Material fracturing occurs typically when the maximum principle stress exceeds the ultimate tensile stress of brittle materials.
The second is showing how far the bolt would be deformed
Correct, but I have a feeling that something is wrong with your analysis, as the bolt is deflecting over 0.4 m (over a foot). It's possible that this value is right, but that would only be the case if your bolt is really big (around 2.25 m in length, which I doubt).
I'd be happy to review your analysis and provide feedback if you can post the model itself and a describe the situation that you're trying to simulate.
Shaun,
So if my bolt is made from high quality structural steel and I need to use the von mises and I can pretty much ignore the pronciple stress? I would need to load it until it reaches the yeild stress and not the UTS?
Marcus,
Your bolt seems a to be a very low grade, a lot lower than the more usual 8.8. Perhaps about 5.8. Is that correct?
Your stresss numbers look to be out by a factor of 1000. If your results really are reading GPa it is very broken. I think your results should be MPa
and you say your bolt loading is 265MN ,,, Mega Newton ... that's a big bolt.
Something is very wrong. Check your loads.
Example for you to compare
M20, grade 8.8. Tightened to 80% yield will require a preload of about 110,000N or 110kN with a 50kN reserve.
Regards
Charles
Hi Charles,
The bolt is big, 245mm with a 80 mm diameter. The UTS is 530 Mpa. Using the simple stress = force/area, then force = stressxarea
force = 530 Mpa x 0.502m^2 for failure
= 265 MN, which the the load that I used in my model. Have I used the wrong figure?
Regards
Marcus
Charles,
You may well have saved me from a huge miscalculation.
The area should be 100 times smaller 5.02x10^-3 m^2
and so the load is in fact 2.65x10^6
Such a basic mistake at the very begining!!!!
Thanks for that.
It's always the easy things that catch one out.
80mm dia is sizable. I rarely go beyond M24.
I think the stress area would be closer to 4.3*10^-3m^2 though and would be the value I would use as the fastener diameter in simulate
Impressive stats for the bolt ...
1.8 MN preload @ 80% yield
16800 Nm torque to tighten to this (making various assumptions about friction etc )
Hydraulicly tensioned presumably
atb
... that should have been 1.4 MN preload @ 80% yield