Creo2 - build code
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Creo2 - build code
Should I go M090 or M100?
I run without PDM - but I don't run with scissors or a lollypop in my mouth.
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Is the list of fixes between builds still available? If so, where is it?
Thanks,
Bob
Bob Monat
Jerand Technical Services, Inc.
bob@jerand.com
www.jerand.com
1-317-875-6087
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Nathan Rollins
<->wrote:
> Hi all – I found a reason to leave Creo2 M070 and want to update…
>
>
>
> Should I go M090 or M100?
>
>
>
> I run without PDM – but I don’t run with scissors or a lollypop in my
> mouth…
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
[cid:image001.png@01CF6F89.7DF86FF0]
Brian Toussaint
Systems Administrator
Hoshizaki America, Inc.
“A Superior Degree Of Reliability”
618 Hwy. 74 S., Peachtree City, GA 30269
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Brian,
Use caution jumping above M080. I have recently found out that my HP with on-board grahics will not work above M080 without OpenGL disabled. If you are using an approved hardware configuration then you are fine. Just make sure before the jump up.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
PTC strongly discourages using Creo Parametric 2.0 M110 with older datecodes. It is important to move all users at once, to avoid models being modified again in older datecodes by other users.
Document - CS150760
Document Information
Type
Article
Date Created
12-Nov-2013 13:04:12 EST
Date Last Updated
10-Mar-2014 12:27:34 EDT
Document Details
Title
Defect in handling of unitized expressions of angular values in PTC Creo Parametric 2.0
Description
• Defect in handling of unitized expressions of angular values
• A dimension driving a coordinate system shows an incorrect value, when a UDF containing relations is placed.
• In Wildfire 4.0 the value is correct, but in Creo Parametric 2.0 a different value is displayed
Applies To
• Creo Parametric 2.0 datecodes: F000 - M100
Cause
• Defect in handling of unitized expressions of angular values in PTC Creo Parametric 2.0 F000 - M100
• The System of Units in PTC Creo Parametric is defined by three primary basic units: length, mass/force, and time. There are two more quantity types included in a System Unit definition: temperature and angle. Inside Creo, all standard System Units contain radian as the basic unit for angular values. However, angular measurements in Creo models are reported in degrees. These contradictions cause inaccurate support of angular values in Relations and Parameters.
Resolution
• SPR 2201931 has been filed with PTC R&D
• Corrected in Creo Parametric 2.0 M110
• PTC strongly discourages using Creo Parametric 2.0 M110 with older datecodes. It is important to move all users at once, to avoid models being modified again in older datecodes by other users.
SPR Information
Product
Creo Parametric, Direct, and Layout
Module
FEATURE OPERATIONS
Reported Release
Creo 2.0
Reported Datecode
M090
Affected Platform
All
Resolution Status
Release
Status
Datecode
Creo 3.0
Evaluating
-
Creo 2.0
Planned
M110
Related Documents
Type
Number
Status
Description
SPR
2201931<">https://www.ptc.com/appserver/cs/view/spr.jsp?n=2201931>
Open
The dimension 'PROFILE_ANGLE' in coordinate system 'BACKUP_CTR_TIP' shows up as
-128.69 instead of -2.25, when UDF is placed. In Wildfire 4.0 the value can be seen
as -2.25, but Creo Parametric 2.0 displays a different value.
David Haigh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
We run PDMLink, so I guess we're running with a lollipop in our hands and scissors........oh, never mind...........
BK
* - That said, M110 is due tomorrow, so if there hasn't been testing, this one might be slated instead to circumvent the "try in the latest build" scenario when something does go wrong.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Windchill users, be aware that your Windchill cache is not supported if jumping more than one maintenance build code. We are in the process of moving from M030 to M090 and just found that out. Recommended practice is to upload or check in all new or modified objects from all workspaces prior to upgrade. Our internal MCAD AE discovered this when one of our users had some weird workspace behavior after upgrading.
David R. Martin II
Senior CAD Application Specialist
Amazon
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
M030 had lots of issues with Windchill and the cache, most of that stuff was fixed by m050/m060.
I can totally believe you would have issues updating from that version.
David Haigh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Tom U.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
[cid:image001.png@01CF737D.CA1D2E50]
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Per PTC's Windchill/Creo Compatibility Matrix (see
BTW, the significance of WC 10.2 m020 is that it is the first build to provide support for Win 8.1 and IE11. Few if any of us out here are jumping on the Win 8.1 bandwagon, but a year from now (or less) all OEM workstations may start shipping with Win 8.1 and IE 11. So WC 10.2 m020 may pay benefits ...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Bill is the improved something you just noticed through testing, or did you actaully see or read about this improvement?
We are getting ready to pull the trigger and load M100, and we do use PDM/Link.
Let me know if you have any further info.
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Brian Toussaint
Systems Administrator
Hoshizaki America, Inc.
"A Superior Degree Of Reliability"
618 Hwy. 74 S., Peachtree City, GA 30269
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Actual testing...We received a pre-release of M110 along with testing the released version of M110.
In our environment...
M100 is more reliable when compared to M070 and M050. Just started testing M110 so have no comment here yet.
M100 is the slowest build we tested out of all Creo 2 builds for communication with Windchill.
We are using M100 because of a reliability issue with M070. (TMP files in users cache folders which hung the Creo session)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Which version of Windchill are you on?
We are using 10.1 m020.
Thanks,
Brad