cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Did you get called away in the middle of writing a post? Don't worry you can find your unfinished post later in the Drafts section of your profile page. X

Symbolic evaluation behaving weird

SS_9781956
8-Gravel

Symbolic evaluation behaving weird

With the four equation evaluated symbolically I am getting results for 3 but the same is giving result as 0 for the last equation any idea?

ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
LucMeekes
23-Emerald III
(To:SS_9781956)

Nothing weird.

Did you intend to differentiate the same expression to four different variables?

Then look at these expressions.

LucMeekes_0-1658339588142.png

The first is different from the last three: it adds R.hcc to a quotient, instead of R.hch.

The 4th differential is to R.h, while R.h is not part of the expression, hence the result is 0.

 

Success!
Luc

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
Werner_E
25-Diamond I
(To:SS_9781956)

And why do you think thats wrong?

The equation is linear in the first three variables you differentiate to, but constant wrt the last one. So the results seem to be correct.

The value for R.sf and R.h is one and same along with rest of equation one gives the value other is giving zero so it seems wrong 

LucMeekes
23-Emerald III
(To:SS_9781956)

Nothing weird.

Did you intend to differentiate the same expression to four different variables?

Then look at these expressions.

LucMeekes_0-1658339588142.png

The first is different from the last three: it adds R.hcc to a quotient, instead of R.hch.

The 4th differential is to R.h, while R.h is not part of the expression, hence the result is 0.

 

Success!
Luc

Announcements

Top Tags