cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Did you get called away in the middle of writing a post? Don't worry you can find your unfinished post later in the Drafts section of your profile page. X

"-23.561944901920921149 or 1.835265713166714" A confusing.

lvl107
20-Turquoise

"-23.561944901920921149 or 1.835265713166714" A confusing.

HIII.PNG

From the above.

The question is the "red", the above. 

"-23.561944901920921149 or 1.835265713166714" A confusing ? Or both are true ?

Regards.

Loi.

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Werner_E
24-Ruby V
(To:lvl107)

As shown in the other thread both are roots and there are many others.

Where do the 1.835... stem from?

Adding pi to get another root is not correct because your function is not periodic. It may look that way for small (negative) values of x because e^(x-pi) gets rather small then. Nevertheless the roots are just close to the roots of cot(x) but always are a bit to the right of them.


B.png

 

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
Werner_E
24-Ruby V
(To:lvl107)

As shown in the other thread both are roots and there are many others.

Where do the 1.835... stem from?

Adding pi to get another root is not correct because your function is not periodic. It may look that way for small (negative) values of x because e^(x-pi) gets rather small then. Nevertheless the roots are just close to the roots of cot(x) but always are a bit to the right of them.


B.png

 

lvl107
20-Turquoise
(To:Werner_E)

IV.PNGV.PNG

Anyway, things I have to say now is : I greatly appreciate your time and especially the explanation :

VI.PNGMany thanks again, Werner.Smiley HappySmiley HappySmiley Happy

Best Regards. 

Werner_E
24-Ruby V
(To:lvl107)


@lvl107 wrote:

V.PNG

 

Yes, just omitting the keyword "fully" would have been an easier way to get the value alone than adding that strange assume-statement on top 😉

Top Tags