Using the "direct network inspection" method. In my previous analysis, there was a mistake (I forgot to calculate a parallel) that now I've corrected. (I renamed the passive and reactive components but the values correspond), and using the Minerr function in the solution block, I obtained these results :
Hello Ssato san,
it's not that you named this resistor differently, it is even that I am mistaken about that. The problem is that this resistor is not in your formula.
I can find no part of your equations that represents this resistor.