Community Tip - You can change your system assigned username to something more personal in your community settings. X
I have problem with configuration of Relationship resource provider in Thingworx 7.1.0, using ILM Extension (newest).
I created manually thing for testing relationships, for relationship Contains/Contained By. I have generated Resource Providers for Input Document and Input.
In configuration tab, I configured relationship as it said in ILM_Extension_Guide -> http://support.ptc.com/WCMS/files/170142/en/ILM_Extension_Guide.pdf
For Role:Contains I set key "Contained By" with type String.
For Role:ContainedBy I set key "Contains" with type Infotable.
I added Role:Contains tag to Input Document Resource Provider, and Role:ContainedBy to Input Resource Provider. (I don't know, if in this point I should do this way or another way).
But when I test service GetRoleProviders, for ContainedBy I get Input Resource Provider, and for Contains I get empty Infotable - so something is wrong.
It was just a test of Relationship Resource Providers, I need a bit different thing.
What I need eventually, is to get and set Relationship Flags for Decomposes To/Decomposed From relations between Inputs and Requirements, and Requirements and Requirements.
During tests I also created thing for this kind of trace, but while testing GetRoleProviders service, I get empty infotables for both, although I added model tags to resource providers.
Can somebody help? That's really important for me.
Solved! Go to Solution.
I achieved what I wanted by not using Relationship resource providers, but by using relationship fields in Resource providers, configured as string, so I can get and save relationships with relationship flags using something like this as the value in relationship field: "12,64x,79", where 12, 64 and 79 are IDs of items in ILM, and "x" is relationship flag for relation with object 64.
Hello, Wojciech.
Let me get one of our ThingWorx Navigate specialists to help you out with this.
Thanks,
-- Craig A.
Hello, Wojciech.
I have responded to you further via e-mail.
Thanks,
-- Craig A.
I achieved what I wanted by not using Relationship resource providers, but by using relationship fields in Resource providers, configured as string, so I can get and save relationships with relationship flags using something like this as the value in relationship field: "12,64x,79", where 12, 64 and 79 are IDs of items in ILM, and "x" is relationship flag for relation with object 64.