Community Tip - You can change your system assigned username to something more personal in your community settings. X
I came across an interesting case that I did not see documented anywhere. I had a job fail to publish at the very end of its run:
Jun 26, 2025, 3:21:04 PM:Done deleting temporary workspace publish13463010064453792551tmp.
Jun 26, 2025, 3:21:04 PM:Start Store Component Viewable Files
Jun 26, 2025, 3:21:18 PM:Uploading Files
Jun 26, 2025, 3:21:24 PM:Error Finalizing Representation
Jun 26, 2025, 3:21:24 PM:Unexpected Exception has occured
Jun 26, 2025, 3:21:24 PM:End Store Component Viewable Files, Error Occured
I've seen this before when we had vaulting issues but other jobs were done just fine. Checking BGMS logs, I noticed this related access exception in the publishing logs:
2025-07-02 07:51:10,018 ERROR [PublisherQueue3.PollingThread] wt.access.evaluation.report Administrator - "<username>" does not have Delete permission for "EPMDoc Config Spec - wt.epm.EPMDocConfigSpec:1834898779" in Administrative Domain "Site /User".
2025-07-02 07:51:10,159 ERROR [PublisherQueue3.PollingThread] wt.wvs.viewmarkup.StandardViewMarkUpService Administrator - ViewMarkUpService: Error postStoreDerviedImage (wt.access.accessResource/19) wt.access.NotAuthorizedException: ATTENTION: Secured Action. You do not have the necessary authorization for this operation. Contact your administrator if you believe you have received this message in error.
at wt.access.StandardAccessControlManager.hasAccess(StandardAccessControlManager.java:11084)
Checking that user I noticed they were a View and Print user. According to CS157235 V&P users cannot create anything. What is strange is that a EPMDocConfigSpec is workspace related right? Publishing is done by a service account user. Odd that Windchill allows the user to request republishing but does not allow it to succeed since their license prevents it. IMHO, V&P should allow interaction with WVS information, markups and annotations.
Solved! Go to Solution.
@avillanueva is this on system upgraded/updated recently to 13.0.1 , There are some SPRs fixed with regards to Print & View and publishing
Thanks for this @Fadel. What is strange is that the user did not see this or must not have since I did see a failed publish job with their username on it. Actually, I resubmitted their job myself is when I saw it. If it was as simple as a popup message denying the action, that would not have created the publish job. it should have not gotten that far. I suspect there is a gap.
@avillanueva is this on system upgraded/updated recently to 13.0.1 , There are some SPRs fixed with regards to Print & View and publishing
I've seen this before. I've added an explicit DENY ACL to prevent this from happening.
Similar concept presented here: https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS412442