Windchill SSO and Local Users
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Windchill SSO and Local Users
We've set up SSO in Windchill with Shibboleth. This works fine. But now we want to login with a local user (like wcadmin) and don't know how to do this. We always get redirected to the Shibboleth and Microsoft Page. Does anyone know how to get this achieved?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Installation
-
Other
- Tags:
- sso
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
There is another option with a similar configuration that I am testing now:
https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS372501?source=search
This has you first hit a special page first.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
There is another option with a similar configuration that I am testing now:
https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS372501?source=search
This has you first hit a special page first.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Hi!
The article that you're referring to has been hidden from public view. Do you have access to it, or can divulge its contents or proposed method?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
You need to have a valid PTC Tech Support account to see those.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Nope, actually hidden. PTC occasionally hides articles for various reasons. If the article is valid and relevant to SSO configuration, please log a PTC support call asking for it to be made public again.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Our VAR was denied access as well. Has access been rescinded, or hasn't the article been revealed to the public just yet?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
My bad. Never knew they did this. Wonder why? I do not want to misquote what it said but we ended up not using it. It caused issue with ThingWorx. We ended up using protocolAuth method:
https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS381855?source=search
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Thanks! Then I'll use no more effort on it.
Perhaps it was withdrawn for the same reason you ended up not using it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
This is what I used for mine:
<LocationMatch ^/+Windchill/+protocolAuth(;.*)?>
AuthName "Windchill"
AuthType Basic
AuthBasicProvider 1-Windchill-EnterpriseLdap
Require valid-user
</LocationMatch>
<Location /basicLogin.html>
AuthName "Windchill"
AuthType Basic
AuthBasicProvider 1-Windchill-EnterpriseLdap
Require valid-user
</Location>
The solution on that page was to create a HTML page that was setup as basic auth. Using the protocolAuth method was a lot better and since it acts like a prefix on any generated URL.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Thanks! We tested a similar solution that was paired with an ipmatch towards REMOTE_ADDR only to allow basic login from certain IP-adresses. We wanted to try limit administrator login from certain locations only. That worked pretty well, though we saw some challenges when using SSO and basicLogin with WGM and DTI, and I had hoped to find some more information about other solutions. I will revisit this later though, after some new rounds of rehosting, patching, and migration.
It did not contain +protocolAuth, so I'll keep this in mind when I later will reapply config.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
See attached
